Concurrent Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Hospital Roommates
- PMID: 30199520
- PMCID: PMC6291367
- DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000316
Concurrent Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Hospital Roommates
Abstract
Background: Some nurse-driven interventions have successfully reduced rates of healthcare-associated infections, though incidence remains unacceptably high. Bacterial contamination in patient rooms may be a source of exposure for patients and thus a target for future interventions; however, few studies have investigated the role of the patient room on organism acquisition.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of concurrent detection of bacterial pathogens among patients sharing a hospital room.
Methods: We performed a retrospective network analysis using electronic administrative and clinical data collected from all patients admitted in 2006 through 2012 to four New York City hospitals, totaling 2,065 beds within 183 inpatient units. A computerized algorithm identified concurrent organism detection among roommates, defined as two patients who shared a room on at least 1 day and had a first positive culture for the same organism within 3 days following cohabitation.
Results: In total, 741,271 patient admissions were included. The algorithm identified 373 concurrent detection events: 158 (42%) in which the patients' first positive cultures were drawn after they were no longer sharing a room but within 3 days of cohabitation, 144 (39%) in which the patients' first positive cultures were drawn while they were still sharing a room but on different days, and 71 (19%) in which the patients' first positive cultures were drawn while they were sharing a room on the same day.
Discussion: Methods to improve environmental decontamination should be included as part of a comprehensive approach to infection prevention in hospitals. Nurses have an important role to play in the planning and implementation of interventions to reduce bioburden in the patient environment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Comment in
-
Visualising the invisible; why cleaning is important in the control of hospital-acquired infection.Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Oct;22(4):117. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103026. Epub 2019 Jun 1. Evid Based Nurs. 2019. PMID: 31154355 No abstract available.
References
-
- Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski JA, Busse R Clarke H, . . . Shamian J (2001). Nurses’ reports on hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs, 20, 43–53. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.43 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anderson RE, Young V, Stewart M, Robertson C, & Dancer SJ (2011). Cleanliness audit of clinical surfaces and equipment: Who cleans what? Journal of Hospital Infection, 78, 178–181. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.030 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Archibald LK, & Jarvis WR (2011). Health care-associated infection outbreak investigations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1946–2005. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174, S47–S64. doi:10.1093/aje/kwr310 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Boyce JM, Potter-Bynoe G, Chenevert C, & King T (1997). Environmental contamination due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Possible infection control implications. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 18, 622–627. doi:10.2307/30141488 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dancer SJ (2009). The role of environmental cleaning in the control of hospital-acquired infection. Journal of Hospital Infection, 73, 378–385. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.030 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
