Periprosthetic tibial fractures in total knee arthroplasty - an outcome analysis of a challenging and underreported surgical issue

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are an increasing problem and challenging to treat. The tibial side is commonly less affected than the femoral side wherefore few studies and case reports are available. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of periprosthetic tibial fractures and compare our data with current literature.

Methods: All periprosthetic tibial TKA fractures that were treated at our Level 1 Trauma Center between 2011 and 2015 were included and analyzed consecutively. The Felix classification was used to assess the fracture type and evaluation included the radiological and clinical outcome (Knee Society Score/KSS, Oxford Knee Score/OKS).

Results: From a total of 50 periprosthetic TKA fractures, 9 cases (7 female, 2 male; 2 cruciate retaining, 7 constrained TKAs) involving the tibial side were identified. The mean age in this group was 77 (65-85) years with a follow-up rate of 67% after a mean of 22 (0-36) months. The Felix classification showed type IB (n = 1), type IIB (n = 2), type IIIA (n = 4) and type IIIB (n = 2) and surgical intervention included ORIF (n = 6), revision arthroplasty (n = 1), arthrodesis (n = 1) and amputation (n = 1). The rate of adverse events and revision was 55.6% including impaired wound healing, infection and re-fracture respectively peri-implant fracture. Main revision surgery included soft tissue surgery, arthrodesis, amputation and re-osteosynthesis. The clinical outcome showed a mean OKS of 29 (19-39) points and a functional/knee KSS of 53 (40-70)/41 (17-72) points. Radiological analyses showed 4 cases of malalignment after reduction and plate fixation.

Conclusions: Periprosthetic tibial fractures predominantly affect elderly patients with a reduced bone quality and reveal a high complication rate. Careful operative planning with individual solutions respecting the individual patient condition is crucial. If ORIF with a plate is considered, restoration of the correct alignment and careful soft tissue management including minimal invasive procedures seem important factors for the postoperative outcome.

Keywords: Felix; Malalignment; Periprosthetic fractures; Total knee arthroplasty.

Fig. 1

Distribution of periprosthetic fractures according to Felix (Felix IB n = 1, IIB n = 2, IIIA n = 4, IIIB n = 2)

Fig. 2

ORIF with a long medial plate in a periprosthetic tibial fracture around a hinged TKA

Fig. 3

Malalignment after double plate fixation of a periprosthetic tibial fracture (Frontal plane: 5° varus malalignment; sagittal plane: 5° anterior tibial slope)