Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 10;6(3):e43.
doi: 10.2196/medinform.8828.

Defining Empowerment and Supporting Engagement Using Patient Views From the Citizen Health Information Portal: Qualitative Study

Affiliations

Defining Empowerment and Supporting Engagement Using Patient Views From the Citizen Health Information Portal: Qualitative Study

Tracie Risling et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

Background: The increasing presence of technology in health care has created new opportunities for patient engagement and with this, an intensified exploration of patient empowerment within the digital health context. While the use of technology, such as patient portals, has been positively received, a clear linkage between digital health solutions, patient empowerment, and health outcomes remains elusive.

Objective: The primary objective of this research was to explore the views of participants enrolled in an electronic health record portal access trial regarding the resultant influence of this technology on their feelings of patient empowerment.

Methods: The exploration of patient empowerment within a digital health context was done with participants in a tethered patient portal trial using interpretive description. Interpretive description is a qualitative methodology developed to pragmatically address clinical health questions. Patient demographics, self-reported health status, and self-identified technology adaptation contributed to the assessment of empowerment in this qualitative approach.

Results: This research produced a view of patient empowerment within the digital health context summarized in two overarching categories: (1) Being Heard and (2) Moving Forward. In each of these, two subcategories further delineate the aspects of empowerment, as viewed by these participants: Knowing More and Seeing What They See under Being Heard, and Owning Future Steps and Promoting Future Care under Moving Forward. This work also highlighted an ongoing interconnectedness between the concepts of patient empowerment, engagement, and activation and the need to further articulate the unique aspects of each of these.

Conclusions: The results of this study contribute needed patient voice to the ongoing evolution of the concept of patient empowerment. In order to move toward more concrete and accurate measure of patient empowerment and engagement in digital health, there must be further consideration of what patients themselves identify as essential aspects of these complex concepts. This research has revealed relational and informational elements as two key areas of focus in the ongoing evolution of patient empowerment operationalization and measure.

Keywords: digital health; electronic health record; patient empowerment; patient engagement; patient portal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participants’ age ranges.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Self-identified health status of participants ranging from well to acutely ill with chronic illness(es).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Technology adoption by participants.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Interpretive categories identified in the qualitative study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Snowdon A, Alessi C, Schnarr K. It's all about me: the personalization of health systems. 2014 http://worldhealthinnovationnetwork.com/images/publications/summaries/Al... .
    1. Cerezo PG, Juvé-Udina M, Delgado-Hito P. Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2016;50(4):667–674. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420160000500018. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342016000... S0080-62342016000400667 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bravo P, Edwards A, Barr PJ, Scholl I, Elwyn G, McAllister M, Cochrane HQRGCU. Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:252. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/15/252 10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herbert RJ, Gagnon AJ, Rennick JE, O'Loughlin JL. A systematic review of questionnaires measuring health-related empowerment. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2009;23(2):107–32. - PubMed
    1. Barr PJ, Scholl I, Bravo P, Faber MJ, Elwyn G, McAllister M. Assessment of patient empowerment--a systematic review of measures. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126553. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126553 PONE-D-14-21091 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources