Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;67(11):2167-2182.
doi: 10.2337/db18-0674. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Novel Mechanism of Foxo1 Phosphorylation in Glucagon Signaling in Control of Glucose Homeostasis

Affiliations

Novel Mechanism of Foxo1 Phosphorylation in Glucagon Signaling in Control of Glucose Homeostasis

Yuxin Wu et al. Diabetes. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Dysregulation of hepatic glucose production (HGP) serves as a major underlying mechanism for the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. The pancreatic hormone glucagon increases and insulin suppresses HGP, controlling blood glucose homeostasis. The forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 promotes HGP through increasing expression of genes encoding the rate-limiting enzymes responsible for gluconeogenesis. We previously established that insulin suppresses Foxo1 by Akt-mediated phosphorylation of Foxo1 at Ser256 in human hepatocytes. In this study, we found a novel Foxo1 regulatory mechanism by glucagon, which promotes Foxo1 nuclear translocation and stability via cAMP- and protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation of Foxo1 at Ser276 Replacing Foxo1-S276 with alanine (A) or aspartate (D) to block or mimic phosphorylation, respectively, markedly regulates Foxo1 stability and nuclear localization in human hepatocytes. To establish in vivo function of Foxo1-Ser276 phosphorylation in glucose metabolism, we generated Foxo1-S273A and Foxo1-S273D knock-in (KI) mice. The KI mice displayed impaired blood glucose homeostasis, as well as the basal and glucagon-mediated HGP in hepatocytes. Thus, Foxo1-Ser276 is a new target site identified in the control of Foxo1 bioactivity and associated metabolic diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of hepatic Foxo1 deletion on glucagon-induced glucose production and gluconeogenesis. A: Blood glucose level in random-fed mice in 1 h after i.p. injection of 0.25 mg/kg body weight glucagon. Ten-week-old mice per treatment. n = 6 mice/group. *P < 0.05 vs. control mice (CNTR); #P < 0.05 for the comparison of designated groups. B: Glucagon tolerance tests for mice after an 18-h overnight fast. Blood glucose levels (mean ± SEM) were determined at the indicated time points after i.p. injection of 16 µg/kg body weight glucagon. n = 6 mice/group. *P < 0.05 vs. CNTR. CE: Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of the livers of mice with i.p. injection of 0.25 mg/kg body glucagon for 1 h. n = 3 mice/treatment. *P < 0.05 vs. CNTR; #P < 0.05 for the comparison of designated groups. F: HGP, glycogenolysis, and gluconeogenesis in primary hepatocytes. Cells were isolated from WT or L-F1KO mice, cultured in DMEM with 2% FBS medium for attachment for 4 h, and then switched to HGP buffer with or without pyruvate substrate. HGP was measured 3 h after 100 nmol/L glucagon stimulation and normalized to total protein levels. n = 3/group. *P < 0.05 vs. CNTR; #P < 0.05 vs. L-F1KO.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regulation of Foxo1 stability and activity by insulin and glucagon in hepatocytes. A: Insulin and glucagon signaling in HepG2 cells. Cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and then starved in DMEM with 1% BSA medium overnight prior to the treatment of 100 nmol/L insulin or 100 nmol/L glucagon over a 6-h time course. Western blotting was performed with 150 µg protein of cell lysates to detect total Foxo1 (t-Foxo1), Akt, CREB, phosphorylated (p)Foxo1-S256, pAkt-T308, and pCREB-S133. Quantification of t-Foxo1/GAPDH (B), pFoxo1-S256/t-Foxo1 (C), pAKT-T308/Akt (D), and pCREB-S133/CREB (E) from A was performed using ImageJ. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. 0-min treatment. n = 3 experiments. F: The mRNA expression of Foxo1 in HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and then starved in DMEM with 1% BSA medium overnight prior to the treatment of 100 nmol/L glucagon over a 6-h time course. The Foxo1 mRNA level was detected by quantitative PCR. n = 3 experiments. CNTR, control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Identification of novel phosphorylation sites of Foxo1 by PKA. A: PKA activates and Akt inhibits Igfbp-1 promoter activity in cells. HepG2 cells were cultured in a six-well plate with DMEM with 10% FBS and then transfected with 0.5 µg Igfbp-1–Luc reporter gene and 0.1 µg RL-luc internal control together with 0.5 µg expression vector for GFP, PKAc, Myr-Akt, hemagglutinin (HA)-Foxo1, or a combination of the two as designated. Cell lysates were prepared for luciferase assays and protein levels of PKA, Akt, Foxo1, or β-actin determined by Western blotting from 20 µg of total protein. n = 3 experiments. Values are fold changes of luciferase activity relative to GFP group and presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. GFP; #P < 0.05 vs. Foxo1. B: Putative phosphorylation sites of Foxo1 by PKA among different species. C: PKA phosphorylates Foxo1 in vitro. A total of 20 µg of recombinant Foxo1-GST was mixed with 5 units (0.5 µg) recombinant active PKAc with or without 0.1 mmol/L ATP for 30 min at 30°C and then the Foxo1-GST and PKAc were resolved in SDS-PAGE after the Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. The intact Foxo1-GST (105 kDa) or cleaved Foxo1 (60 kDa) was incised from the gel and subjected to LC-MS/MS. D: MS/MS spectra of peptide containing S153 and S276 of Foxo1. Antibodies against phosphorylated Foxo1 at S153 and S276 were generated. E and F: Phosphorylation of Foxo1-S276 and S153 by glucagon in cells. E: HepG2 cells were transfected with either scramble siRNA or siRNA–PKA catalytic subunit C (PKACB) for 24 h and then treated with or without 100 nmol/L glucagon for 60 min. Quantification of total Foxo1 (t-Foxo1), phosphorylated (p)Foxo1-S276, pFoxo1-S153, pCREB, and CREB was performed using ImageJ and normalized by GAPDH. *P < 0.05 vs. scramble siRNA; #P < 0.05 vs. scramble siRNA + glucagon. n = 3 experiments. F: Primary hepatocytes were cultured and treated with either 100 nmol/L glucagon or 10 μmol/L 8-Br–cAMP for 30 min or 10 μmol/L PKA inhibitor H89 for 30 min prior to 60 min of 100 nmol/L glucagon treatment. Phosphorylation of Foxo1-S150 and S273 were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies at 1:500 dilution. Quantification of pFoxo1-S273, pFoxo1-S150, and t-Foxo1 was performed using ImageJ and normalized by β-actin. n = 3 experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle; #P < 0.05 vs. glucagon.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Glucagon promotes phosphorylation of Foxo1-S153 and S276 in vivo. A: Random-fed mice were i.p. injected with glucagon at 0.25 mg/kg body weight, and the liver was collected 15 min after injection to determine hepatic Foxo1 phosphorylation at S150 and S273 by using Western blotting. Quantification of phosphorylated (p)Foxo1-S273 and pFoxo1-S150 was performed using ImageJ and normalized by β-actin. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle. n = 4–6 mice/group. BD: Eight-week-old WT mice were i.v. injected with GCGR antagonist ([des-His1, Glu9]-Glucagon amide; 1 mg/kg body weight) after 6 h fasting. B: Blood glucose level was measured at the indicated time points. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle. n = 4–6 mice/group. C: Area under the curve (AUC) from B was calculated. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle. n = 4–6 mice/group. D: Liver was collected 45 min after [des-His1, Glu9]-Glucagon amide injection to determine hepatic total Foxo1 (t-Foxo1) and Foxo1 phosphorylation at S150 and S273 by using Western blotting. Quantification of t-Foxo1, pFoxo1-S273, pFoxo1-S150, pCREB, and CREB was performed using ImageJ and normalized by GAPDH. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle. n = 4–6 mice/group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Foxo1-S276 phosphorylation controls cAMP-induced Foxo1 nuclear localization in hepatocytes. HepG2 cells were transfected with 5 µg plasmid DNA expressing GFP-Foxo1-WT, S276A, S276D, S153A, or S153D for 18 h and then treated with or without 10 μmol/L cAMP for 30 min. GFP-positive cells were displayed, stained with DAPI for nucleus, and analyzed under confocal microscope. Representative images are shown.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Glucagon or cAMP stimulates Foxo1 nuclear localization and Foxo1-S276 phosphorylation, enhancing Foxo1 stability in hepatocytes. A: HepG2 cells were transfected with 5 µg plasmid DNA expressing hemagglutinin (HA)-Foxo1 for 18 h and then treated with 100 nmol/L glucagon, 10 μmol/L cAMP, or 100 nmol/L insulin for 30 min prior to extraction of nuclear (N) and cytoplasmic (C) proteins. A total of 20 µg nuclear protein or 100 µg cytoplasmic protein was immunoblotted to determine the abundance of total Foxo1 (t-Foxo1) in nucleus or cytoplasm. Signal intensity was quantified by ImageJ software for statistical comparison. Cytoplasmic and nuclear protein levels were normalized by GAPDH and histone H1, respectively. n = 3 experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle in cytoplasm; #P < 0.05 vs. vehicle in nucleus. B and C: Distribution of Foxo1-S276 mutant proteins in the nucleus and cytoplasm of cells. HepG2 cells were transfected with 5 µg plasmid DNA expressing Foxo1-WT, S276A, or S276D for 18 h and then treated with or without 100 nmol/L glucagon (Glc) for 30 min. Nuclear (N) or cytoplasmic (C) protein was extracted to determine protein abundance of Foxo1-S276 mutants in nucleus and cytoplasm. Representative images are shown in B and C, and signal intensity was quantified by ImageJ software for statistical comparison. n = 3 experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle in cytoplasm; #P < 0.05 vs. vehicle in nucleus. D: Foxo1-S276 mutations influence Foxo1 stability in a proteasome-dependent manner. Western blotting was performed to detect t-Foxo1 abundance in HepG2 cells that was transfected with the same amount of plasmid DNA expressing Foxo1-WT, S276A, or S276D for 10 h, and cells were then starved for 8 h and treated with 10 μmol/L CHX or 10 µg/mL MG132 (MG) for 6 h prior cellular protein collection. Representative images are shown. Signal intensity was quantified and normalized by α-actinin for statistical analysis. *P < 0.05 vs. Foxo1-WT; #P < 0.05 for the comparison of designated groups. n = 3 different experiments. E: Foxo1-S276 mutations influence insulin-induced Foxo1 ubiquitination. HepG2 cells were cotransfected with eGFP expression vectors encoding WT Foxo1, Foxo1-S276D, or Foxo1-S276A and/or FLAG-ubiquitin for 10 h; cells were starved for 12 h and then treated with 100 nmol/L insulin for 12 h. Quantification of t-Foxo1 normalized by α-actinin was performed using ImageJ. *P < 0.05 vs. Foxo1-WT and FLAG-ubiquitin group; #P < 0.05 for comparison of designated groups. n = 3 different experiments.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Foxo1-S276D impairs insulin-stimulated Foxo1 nuclear export in hepatocytes. A: HepG2 cells were transfected with 5 µg plasmid DNA expressing eGFP-Foxo1-WT or eGFP-Foxo1-S276D for 18 h, and cells were then serum starved for 8 h prior to 100 nmol/L insulin treatment for 0, 30, 90, or 120 min. The GFP-positive cells were displayed, stained with DAPI for nucleus, and analyzed under the confocal microscope. Representative images are shown. B: HepG2 cells were transfected with 10 µg eGFP expression vectors encoding Foxo1-WT or Foxo1-S276D for 18 h and followed by 8-h serum starvation prior to 100 nmol/L insulin (Ins) stimulation for 90 and 120 min. Western blotting was performed for total Foxo1 (t-Foxo1) and phosphorylated (p)Foxo1-S256 in cytoplasm (C) and nucleus (N). C: Quantification of t-Foxo1 and pFoxo1-S256/t-Foxo1 was performed by ImageJ. Cytoplasmic (C) and nuclear (N) protein levels were normalized by GAPDH and histone H1, respectively. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 different experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. 0 min of insulin treatment from Foxo1-WT in cytoplasm; #P < 0.05 vs. 0 min of insulin treatment from Foxo1-WT in nucleus.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Foxo1-S273 mutations impair blood glucose and HGP in mice. A: Blood glucose levels of random-fed or 18-h–fasted mice. n = 4–6 mice/genotype. *P < 0.05 vs. WT mice. B: Quantitative PCR analysis of expression of Igfbp-1 and G6pc in the liver of 18-h–fasted mice. n = 4 mice/genotype. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs. WT mice. C: Foxo1 protein levels in the livers of the mutant mice. Western blotting results from two mice per genotype are shown representatively. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs. WT. n = 4/group. D: HGP assays in the primary hepatocytes isolated from WT, Foxo1-S273A/A, and Foxo1-S273D/D KI mice. Fresh hepatocytes were isolated from these mice, and HGP were measured 3 h after 100 nmol/L glucagon stimulation and normalized to total protein levels. n = 3/treatment. *P < 0.05 vs. WT with vehicle group; #P < 0.05 for the comparison of designated groups. E and F: Glucagon tolerance tests. E: Glucagon tolerance tests for mice after an 18-h overnight fast. Blood glucose levels (mean ± SEM) were determined at the indicated time points after i.p. injection of 16 µg/kg body weight glucagon. n = 6 mice. *P < 0.05 vs. WT. F: Area under the curve (AUC) from E was calculated. *P < 0.05 vs. WT. n = 4–6/group. G: Blood glucagon, insulin, and glucose levels in WT and db/db mice in an 18-h fasting state. **P < 0.01 vs. WT. n = 4 mice/group. H: Phosphorylated (p)Foxo1-S273, pFoxo1-S253, total Foxo1 (t-Foxo1), pPKA-T179, PKA, histone H1, and GAPDH in 100 µg cytoplasmic protein (C) and 20 µg nuclear protein (N) of mouse livers were determined by Western blotting. I: Quantification of pFoxo1-S273, pS253, t-Foxo1, pPKA-T197, or PKA was performed by ImageJ. The cytoplasmic (C) and nuclear (N) protein levels were normalized by GAPDH and histone H1, respectively. *P < 0.05 vs. WT. n = 3 mice/group. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. J: Blood glucagon, insulin, and glucose levels in LFD- and HFD-fed WT mice in an 18-h fasting state. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs. LFD. n = 4/group. K: pFoxo1-S273, t-Foxo1, pCREB, and CREB levels of mouse livers were determined by Western blotting. L: Quantification of pFoxo1-S273, t-Foxo1, pCREB, and CREB was performed by ImageJ. *P < 0.05 vs. LFD. n = 4 mice/group. Results are shown as mean ± SEM.

References

    1. Ali S, Drucker DJ. Benefits and limitations of reducing glucagon action for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2009;296:E415–E421 - PubMed
    1. Edgerton DS, Cherrington AD. Glucagon as a critical factor in the pathology of diabetes. Diabetes 2011;60:377–380 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Unger RH. Glucagon physiology and pathophysiology. N Engl J Med 1971;285:443–449 - PubMed
    1. Tahrani AA, Bailey CJ, Del Prato S, Barnett AH. Management of type 2 diabetes: new and future developments in treatment. Lancet 2011;378:182–197 - PubMed
    1. Johnson DG, Goebel CU, Hruby VJ, Bregman MD, Trivedi D. Hyperglycemia of diabetic rats decreased by a glucagon receptor antagonist. Science 1982;215:1115–1116 - PubMed

Publication types