Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1986 Oct;4(10):1443-54.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.10.1443.

Late intensive combined modality therapy followed by autologous bone marrow infusion in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Comparative Study

Late intensive combined modality therapy followed by autologous bone marrow infusion in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

D C Ihde et al. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Oct.

Abstract

To attempt to improve the poor prognosis of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, we tried to administer late intensive combined modality therapy (LICMRX) to patients with good tumor regression after 12 weeks of conventional chemotherapy. Twenty-nine consecutive extensive-stage SCLC patients received 6 weeks of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and lomustine (CMC) induction therapy, followed by 6 weeks of vincristine, doxorubicin, and procarbazine (VAP). After restaging for assessment of tumor response, autologous bone marrow (ABM) was collected in patients in good medical condition with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and no tumor on marrow examination. LICMRX consisted of irradiation with 2,000 rad in five fractions for five days to sites of initial tumor involvement, followed by cyclophosphamide, 60 mg/kg for 2 days, and etoposide, 200 mg/m2 for 3 days and then by ABM infusion. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was administered thereafter, but no further chemotherapy was used. Due to lack of tumor regression or poor medical condition, only ten of the original 29 patients were eligible for LICMRX; two refused, so only eight (28%) received therapy. Three patients who began LICMRX in CR developed recurrence of SCLC after an additional 4, 8, and 15 months. Of five patients with PR, one attained CR but relapsed at 3 months, two remained in PR and progressed at 2 and 4 months, and two died of infection without recovery from LICMRX. Mean time from ABM infusion to recovery of granulocyte count to 500/microL was 15.8 days in the six surviving patients (range, 12-22). The major non-hematologic toxicity of LICMRX was severe esophagitis. Among all 29 patients, there were six CRs (21%) and no 2-year survivors, compared with a CR rate of 36% and 10% 2-year survivors in 78 extensive-stage patients previously treated with CMC plus VAP without LICMRX. We conclude that the LICMRX given in this study can be administered to only a minority of extensive-stage SCLC patients and is very unlikely to yield substantial improvement in the fraction of 2-year survivors (95% confidence limits for 2-year survival 0% to 10%).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms