Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 10;15(9):1971.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091971.

Ionizing Radiation and Human Health: Reviewing Models of Exposure and Mechanisms of Cellular Damage. An Epigenetic Perspective

Affiliations
Review

Ionizing Radiation and Human Health: Reviewing Models of Exposure and Mechanisms of Cellular Damage. An Epigenetic Perspective

Ernesto Burgio et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

We reviewed available evidence in medical literature concerning experimental models of exposure to ionizing radiations (IR) and their mechanisms of producing damages on living organisms. The traditional model is based on the theory of "stochastic breakage" of one or both strands of the DNA double helix. According to this model, high doses may cause the breaks, potentially lethal to the cell by damaging both DNA strands, while low doses of IR would cause essentially single strands breaks, easily repairable, resulting in no permanent damages. The available evidence makes this classical model increasingly less acceptable, because the exposure to low doses of IR seems to have carcinogenic effects, even after years or decades, both in the exposed individuals and in subsequent generations. In addition, the cells that survived the exposure to low doses, despite being apparently normal, accumulate damages that become evident in their progeny, such as nonclonal chromosomal aberrations, which can be found even in cells not directly irradiated due to the exchange of molecular signals and complex tissue reactions involving neighboring or distant cells. For all these reasons, a paradigm shift is needed, based on evidence and epigenetics.

Keywords: carcinogenic mechanisms; cellular damage; epigenetic mechanisms; ionizing radiations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barcellos-Hoff M.H. Cancer as an emergent phenomenon in systems radiation biology. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2008;47:33–38. doi: 10.1007/s00411-007-0141-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wakeford R. The cancer epidemiology of radiation. Oncogene. 2004;23:6404–6428. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207896. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Folley J.H., Borges W., Yamawaki T. Incidence of leukemia in survivors of the atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Am. J. Med. 1952;13:311–321. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(52)90285-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ron E., Lubin J.H., Shore R.E., Mabuchi K., Modan B., Pottern L.M., Schneider A.B., Tucker M.A., Boice J.D., Jr. Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: a pooled analysis of seven studies. Radiat. Res. 1995;141:259–277. doi: 10.2307/3579003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Land C.E., Tokunaga M., Tokuoka S., Nakamura N. Early-onset breast cancer in A-bomb survivors. Lancet. 1993;342:237. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92324-M. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources