Real-world retrospective cohort study ARCTIC shows burden of comorbidities in Swedish COPD versus non-COPD patients
- PMID: 30202023
- PMCID: PMC6131165
- DOI: 10.1038/s41533-018-0101-y
Real-world retrospective cohort study ARCTIC shows burden of comorbidities in Swedish COPD versus non-COPD patients
Abstract
This study aimed to generate real-world evidence to assess the burden of comorbidities in COPD patients, to effectively manage these patients and optimize the associated healthcare resource allocation. ARCTIC is a large, real-world, retrospective cohort study conducted in Swedish COPD patients using electronic medical record data collected between 2000 and 2014. These patients were studied for prevalence of various comorbidities and for association of these comorbidities with exacerbations, mortality, and healthcare costs compared with an age-, sex-, and comorbidities-matched non-COPD reference population. A total of 17,479 patients with COPD were compared with 84,514 non-COPD reference population. A significantly higher prevalence of various comorbidities was observed in COPD patients 2 years post-diagnosis vs. reference population, with the highest percentage increase observed for cardiovascular diseases (81.8% vs. 30.7%). Among the selected comorbidities, lung cancer was relatively more prevalent in COPD patients vs. reference population (relative risk, RR = 5.97, p < 0.0001). Ischemic heart disease, hypertension, depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and asthma caused increased mortality rates in COPD patients. Comorbidities that were observed to be significantly associated with increased number of severe exacerbations in COPD patients included heart failure, ischemic heart disease, depression/anxiety, sleep disorders, osteoporosis, lung cancer, and stroke. The cumulative healthcare costs associated with comorbidities over 2 years after the index date were observed to be significantly higher in COPD patients (€27,692) vs. reference population (€5141) (p < 0.0001). The data support the need for patient-centered treatment strategies and targeted healthcare resource allocation to reduce the humanistic and economic burden associated with COPD comorbidities.
Conflict of interest statement
B.S. has received honoraria for educational activities and lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Meda, Novartis and Teva, and has served on advisory boards arranged by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Meda, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva and Boehringer Ingelheim. K.K., J.-B.G., and F.S.G. are employed by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. C.J. has received honoraria for educational activities and lectures from Novartis, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, TEVA and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. G.J. has participated in the steering committee by Novartis for this study and served on advisory boards arranged by AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Takeda. K.L. has, during the last 5 years, on one or more occasion served in an advisory board and/or served as speaker and/or participated in education arranged by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Orion, Novartis, TEVA and Takeda. L.J. and M.U. are employed by IQVIA. K.L. has received payments for educational activities and lectures from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Meda, MSD, Novartis and Nycomed, served on advisory boards arranged by Novartis and Meda, and has participated in the steering committee by Novartis for this study.
Figures
References
-
- GOLD. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, http://goldcopd.org/ (2017).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
