Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;63(11):1159-1168.
doi: 10.1038/s10038-018-0501-4. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Gastric cancer may share genetic predisposition with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese populations

Affiliations

Gastric cancer may share genetic predisposition with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese populations

Linhua Yao et al. J Hum Genet. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Many features are shared between esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore whether known EC susceptibility loci are also important in the development of GC. A total of 21 genetic variants associated with EC in genome-wide association studies were evaluated with association of GC risk in 2631 cases and 4373 controls of Chinese ancestry. Single variant and weighted genetic scores (WGS) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and overall EC were analyzed with GC risk, respectively. Genetic variants of rs2274223 in PLCE1 at 10q23.33 (per G allele: odds ratio (OR) = 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-1.38, P = 6.51 × 10-8), rs10052657 in PDE4D at 5q11.2 (per C allele: OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.25, P = 3.28 × 10-2) and rs671 in ALDH2 at 12q24.12 (per A-allele: OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.91, P = 1.14 × 10-4) were significantly associated with GC risk. The combined effect of those three variants had stronger influence on GC risk (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.19-1.44, P = 2.34 × 10-8). High WGS of ESCC was also associated with increased risk of GC (P = 5.52 × 10-4 as a continuous variable) (trend test P = 2.71 × 10-4), whereas no statistically significant associations were observed between the WGS of EAC and GC risk (P = 0.66 as a continuous variable) (trend test P = 0.70). ESCC rather than EAC may share genetic susceptibility with GC. Genetic variants at 10q23.33, 5q11.2, and 12q24.12 may be useful as biomarkers to identify individuals with high risk for both ESCC and GC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oncogene. 2013 Feb 28;32(9):1121-34 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;46:355-79 - PubMed
    1. J Pathol. 2012 May;227(1):29-41 - PubMed
    1. Carcinogenesis. 2015 Feb;36(2):223-31 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources