Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):445-456.
doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.445. eCollection 2018.

Development and Evaluation of Two Integrated Care Models for Children Using a Partnered Formative Evaluation Approach

Affiliations

Development and Evaluation of Two Integrated Care Models for Children Using a Partnered Formative Evaluation Approach

Bonnie T Zima et al. Ethn Dis. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe the development and evaluation of two integrated care models using a partnered formative evaluation approach across a private foundation, clinic leaders, providers and staff, and a university-based research center.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using multiple data sources.

Setting: Two federal qualified health care centers serving low-income children and families in Chicago.

Participants: Private foundation, clinic and academic partners.

Interventions: Development of two integrated care models and partnered evaluation design.

Main outcome measures: Accomplishments and early lessons learned.

Results: Together, the foundation-clinic-academic partners worked to include best practices in two integrated care models for children while developing the evaluation design. A shared data collection approach, which empowered the clinic partners to collect data using a web-based tool for a prospective longitudinal cohort study, was also created.

Conclusion: Across three formative evaluation stages, the foundation, clinic, and academic partners continued to reach beyond their respective traditional roles of project oversight, clinical service, and research as adjustments were collectively made to accommodate barriers and unanticipated events. Together, an innovative shared data collection approach was developed that extends partnered research to include data collection being led by the clinic partners and supported by the technical resources of a university-based research center.

Keywords: Child Mental Health; Formative Evaluation; Integrated Care; Partnered Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Healthy Minds, Healthy Children, Healthy Chicago (H3) project overview by partnered formative evaluation stage.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Partnered integrated care model
a. Cutoff scores for the PSC are ≥24 for ages 3-5 years, and ≥28 for ages 6 -18 years. b. Clinical judgment if need for mental health services may include children 0-2. c. Trauma events screening included in baseline interview for evaluation. FRD, Family Resource Developer; PSC, Pediatric Symptom Checklist; SMH, specialty mental health.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Croghan TW, Brown JD. Integrating Mental Health Treatment into the Patient-centered Medical Home. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.
    1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Crossing the Quality Chasm Adaptation to Mental Health and Addictive Disorders. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services New Freedom Commission on Mental Health: Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Final Report. Rockville, Md: Department of Health and Human Services. 2003;SMA-03-3832.
    1. U.S. Public Health Service Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.
    1. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, PL 111-148, sec. 3021(2010). - PubMed

Publication types