Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 6:11:1756284818793561.
doi: 10.1177/1756284818793561. eCollection 2018.

Anticoagulant therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis: insights for the clinician

Affiliations
Review

Anticoagulant therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis: insights for the clinician

Stefania Basili et al. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication in the natural history of patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). The prevalence of PVT in LC is highly variable, ranging from 0.6% to 25% according to different reports. The impact of PVT on the natural history of LC is unclear, but it seems to negatively affect the prognosis of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) by increasing post-LT mortality and delaying waiting time. The antithrombotic treatment of PVT is still challenging as PVT may often remain asymptomatic and incidentally diagnosed, and a spontaneous partial/total regression of PVT is observed in an important proportion of patients, even in the absence of anticoagulation. Recent evidence suggested that the anticoagulant treatment for PVT may favorably affect both ischemic and bleeding outcomes in LC patients. Anticoagulant therapies so far available include unfractioned heparin, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and fondaparinux for acute treatment, and LMWHs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for long-term treatment. No robust data currently support the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with LC and PVT, as the safety and efficacy of DOACs in this setting is still unclear. This review summarizes current evidence for the evaluation and management of patients with LC and PVT.

Keywords: DOACs; LMWH; VKAs; fondaparinux; liver cirrhosis; portal vein thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Evaluation and management of patients with incident PVT. PVT, portal vein thrombosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferro D, Angelico F, Caldwell SH, et al. Bleeding and thrombosis in cirrhotic patients: what really matters? Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 275–279. - PubMed
    1. Lai CH, Cheng PY, Chen YY. Liver cirrhosis and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a 9-year follow-up study. Stroke 2011; 42: 2615–2617. - PubMed
    1. Basili S, Raparelli V, Napoleone L, et al. Platelet count does not predict bleeding in cirrhotic patients: results from the PRO-LIVER study. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 368–375. - PubMed
    1. Lisman T, Violi F. Cirrhosis as a risk factor for venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117: 3–5. - PubMed
    1. Raparelli V, Basili S, Carnevale R, et al. Low-grade endotoxemia and platelet activation in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2017; 65: 571–581. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources