A review of the validity of computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in mild traumatic brain injury assessment
- PMID: 30202572
- PMCID: PMC6093758
- DOI: 10.2217/cnc-2016-0021
A review of the validity of computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in mild traumatic brain injury assessment
Abstract
Computerized neurocognitive assessment tools (NCATs) offer potential advantages over traditional neuropsychological tests in postconcussion assessments. However, their psychometric properties and clinical utility are still questionable. The body of research regarding the validity and clinical utility of NCATs suggests some support for aspects of validity (e.g., convergent validity) and some ability to distinguish between concussed individuals and controls, though there are still questions regarding the validity of these tests and their clinical utility, especially outside of the acute injury timeframe. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive summary of the existing validity literature for four commonly used and studied NCATs (automated neuropsychological assessment metrics, CNS vital signs, cogstate and immediate post-concussion and cognitive testing) and lay the groundwork for future investigations.
Keywords: computerized cognitive testing; computerized neurocognitive assessment tools; computerized neurocognitive test; literature review; neuropsychological assessment; psychometric; validity.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial & competing interests disclosure This material is published by permission of the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, operated by General Dynamics Information Technology for the US Defense Health Agency under Contract No. W91YTZ-13-C-0015. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
References
-
- McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br. J. Sports Med. 2013;47(5):250–258. - PubMed
-
- US House of Representatives. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008. Section 1618. Comprehensive plan on prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of, and research on, traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other mental health conditions in members of the armed forces. 2008. www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ181/pdf/PLAW-110publ181.pdf
-
- Echemendia RJ, Iverson GL, McCrea M, et al. Advances in neuropsychological assessment of sport-related concussion. Br. J. Sports Med. 2013;47(5):294–298. - PubMed
-
- Roebuck-Spencer T, Sun W, Cernich AN, Farmer K, Bleiberg J. Assessing change with the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM): issues and challenges. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2007;22(Suppl. 1):S79–S87. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources