Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;13(3):129-135.
doi: 10.1007/s11751-018-0316-z. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

Transverse debridement and acute shortening followed by distraction histogenesis in the treatment of open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue loss

Affiliations

Transverse debridement and acute shortening followed by distraction histogenesis in the treatment of open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue loss

Saif Salih et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

This retrospective case series evaluates the technique of transverse debridement, acute shortening and subsequent distraction histogenesis in the management of open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue loss, thereby avoiding the need for a soft tissue flap to cover the wound. Thirty-one patients with Gustilo grade III open tibial fractures between 2001 and 2011 were initially managed with transverse wound extensions, debridement and shortening to provide bony apposition and allowing primary wound closure without tension, or coverage with mobilization of soft tissue and split skin graft. Temporary monolateral external fixation was used to allow soft tissues resuscitation, followed by Ilizarov frame for definitive fracture stabilization. Leg length discrepancy was corrected by corticotomy and distraction histogenesis. Union was evaluated radiologically and clinically. Patients' mean age was 37.3 years (18.3-59.3). Mean bone defect was 3.2 cm (1-8 cm). Mean time to union was 40.1 weeks (12.6-80.7 weeks), and median frame index was 75 days/cm. Median lengthening index (time in frame after corticotomy for lengthening) was 63 days/cm. Mean clinic follow-up was 79 weeks (23-174). Six patients had a total of seven complications. Four patients re-fractured after frame removal, one of whom required a second frame. Two patients required a second frame for correction of residual deformity, and one patient developed a stiff non-union which united following a second frame. There were no cases of deep infection. Acute shortening followed by distraction histogenesis is a safe method for the acute treatment of open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue loss. This method also avoids the cost, logistical issues and morbidity associated with the use of local or free-tissue transfer flaps and has a low rate of serious complications despite the injury severity.

Keywords: Circular frame; Deformity correction; Distraction histogenesis; Ilizarov frame; Limb reconstruction; Open fractures; Soft tissue flap; Tibia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The work was registered with the host institution’s Clinical Effectiveness Unit, and no ethical approval is required.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Incision made transversely across tibial crest with non-viable bone removed
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
In this case, the bone ends were cut with a continuously irrigated oscillating saw to ensure sound bony apposition and a stable final construct
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Reducing the bone ends produces the acute shortening, and the transverse elliptical incision becomes closable without tension. Final fixation was undertaken in this case with an Ilizarov circular frame, but in more recent cases a monolateral external fixator is more frequently used
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pre-operative AP radiograph (a). First post-operative radiograph (b) showing proximal corticotomy and frame. AP (c) and lateral (d) radiographs of frame during distraction histogenesis. Final AP (e) and lateral (f) radiographs following frame removal

References

    1. Papakostidis C, Kanakaris NK, Pretel J, et al. Prevalence of complications of open tibial shaft fractures stratified as per the Gustilo–Anderson classification. Injury. 2011;42:1408–1415. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nanchahal J, Nayagam D, et al. The standards for the management of open fractures of the lower limb. 1. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2009.
    1. Gopal S, Majumder S, Batchelor AG, et al. Fix and flap: the radical orthopaedic and plastic treatment of severe open fractures of the tibia. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2000;82:959–966. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.82B7.10482. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Townley WA, Nguyen DQA, Rooker JC, et al. Management of open tibial fractures: a regional experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:693–696. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12699663904592. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parrett BM, Matros E, Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP. Lower extremity trauma: trends in the management of soft-tissue reconstruction of open tibia–fibula fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1315–1322. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000204959.18136.36. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources