Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low versus high gradient severe aortic stenosis in the setting of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
- PMID: 30203608
- PMCID: PMC8477170
- DOI: 10.1111/joic.12561
Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low versus high gradient severe aortic stenosis in the setting of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for low gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains an area of clinical uncertainty.
Methods: Retrospective review identified 422 patients who underwent TAVR between September 4, 2014 and July 1, 2016. Procedural indication other than severe AS (n = 22) or LVEF <50% (n = 98) were excluded. Outcomes were defined by valve academic research consortium two criteria when applicable and compared between LG (peak velocity <4.0 m/s and mean gradient <40 mmHg; n = 73) and high gradient (HG) (n = 229) groups. The LG group was further categorized as low stroke volume index (SVI) (n = 41) or normal SVI (n = 32). Median follow-up was 747 days [interquartile range 220-1013].
Results: Baseline thirty-day mortality risk (LG 6.2% [3.8-8.1] vs HG 5.7% [4.1-7.4], P = 0.43) did not differ between groups. Short-term outcomes, including procedural success rate (86.1% vs 88.8%, P = 0.53), peri-procedural complications (intra-procedural heart block: 6.8% vs 7.9%, P = 0.99; permanent pacemaker placement: 11.0% vs 13.6%, P = 0.69; moderate paravalvular regurgitation: 2.7% vs 1.3%, P = 0.60), and all-cause in-hospital mortality (2.7% vs 0.9%, P = 0.25) did not differ between LG and HG groups. On long-term follow-up, all-cause mortality also did not differ between LG and HG groups (6.8% vs 10.0%, plog-rank = 0.33) or between the LG low SVI (9.8%), LG normal SVI (3.1%), and HG (10.0%) groups (plog-rank = 0.39).
Conclusion: Patients with preserved LVEF undergoing TAVR for severe AS with LG, including LG with low SVI, have no significant difference in adverse outcomes when compared to patients with HG.
Keywords: aortic stenosis; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.028. Epub 2018 Nov 15. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30448116
-
Outcome of Patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Aortic Valve Replacement.Heart Surg Forum. 2017 Jul 20;20(4):E124-E128. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1709. Heart Surg Forum. 2017. PMID: 28846524
-
Predictors of Mortality and Symptomatic Outcome of Patients With Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e007977. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007977. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29654191 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in patients with high gradient versus low ejection fraction low gradient severe aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Apr;73:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.020. Epub 2024 Jul 27. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025. PMID: 39089911
-
What Is New in Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Surgery, TAVR, or Medical Therapy?Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jul 9;22(9):78. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01341-x. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020. PMID: 32648081 Review.
Cited by
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Do Patients Experience Better Quality of Life Regardless of Gradient?Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 Jan 1;50(1):e217659. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7659. Tex Heart Inst J. 2023. PMID: 36695735 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Otto CM, Prendergast B. Aortic-valve stenosis—from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:744–756. - PubMed
-
- Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115:2856–2864. - PubMed
-
- Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Mathieu P, Senechai M, Pibarot P. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1259–1267. - PubMed
-
- Mohty D, Magne J, Deltreuil M, et al.Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study. Circulation. 2013;128:S235–S242. - PubMed
-
- Clavel MA, Burwash IG, Pibarot P. Cardiac imaging for assessing low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;10:185–202. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials