Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Oct;132(4):895-905.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002822.

Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Tara C Jatlaoui  1 , Maura K Whiteman, Gary Jeng, Naomi K Tepper, Erin Berry-Bibee, Denise J Jamieson, Polly A Marchbanks, Kathryn M Curtis
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Tara C Jatlaoui et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate expulsion rates among women with postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) placement by timing of insertion, IUD type, and delivery method.

Data sources: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1974 to May 2018.

Methods of study selection: We searched databases for any published studies that examined postpartum placement of a copper IUD or levonorgestrel intrauterine system and reported counts of expulsions. We assessed study quality using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force evidence grading system. We calculated pooled absolute rates of IUD expulsion and estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs) for timing of postpartum placement, delivery method, and IUD type using log-binomial multivariable regression model.

Tabulation, integration, and results: We identified 48 level I to II-3 studies of poor to good quality. Pooled rates of expulsion varied by timing of IUD placement, ranging from 1.9% with interval placements (4 weeks postpartum or greater), 10.0% for immediate placements (10 minutes or less after placental delivery), and 29.7% for early placements (greater than 10 minutes to less than 4 weeks postpartum). Immediate and early postpartum placements were associated with increased risk of expulsion compared with interval placement (adjusted RR 7.63, 95% CI 4.31-13.51; adjusted RR 6.17, 95% CI 3.19-11.93, respectively). Postpartum placement less than 4 weeks after vaginal delivery was associated with an increased risk of expulsion compared with cesarean delivery (adjusted RR 5.19, 95% CI 3.85-6.99). Analysis of expulsion rates at less than 4 weeks postpartum also indicated that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was associated with a higher risk of expulsion (adjusted RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.50-2.43) compared with CuT380A.

Conclusion: Postpartum IUD expulsion rates vary by timing of placement, delivery method, and IUD type. These results can aid in counseling women to make an informed choice about when to initiate their IUD and to help institutions implement postpartum contraception programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure

The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flow diagram of publication selection for inclusion into the review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Whitaker AK, Chen BA. Society of Family Planning Guidelines: postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices. Contraception 2018;97:2–13. - PubMed
    1. Kapp N, Curtis KM. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Contraception 2009; 80:327–36. - PubMed
    1. Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Hubacher D, Stuart G, Van Vliet HA. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 6 Art. No.: CD003036 DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD003036.pub3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonalkar S, Kapp N. Intrauterine device insertion in the post-partum period: a systematic review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2015;20:4–18. - PubMed
    1. Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, Berry-Bibee E, Horton LG, Zapata LB, et al. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65:1–103. - PubMed