Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 30205163
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.001
Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Study objective: To investigate risk factors for infertility and recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after previous CSP.
Design: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).
Setting: University hospital.
Patients: Between January 2007 and April 2016, a total of 650 patients were included, all diagnosed with CSP and treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and uterine artery embolization (UAE), followed by suction curettage under hysteroscopic guidance.
Intervention: None.
Measurements and main results: Follow-up of the reproductive outcomes ended in June 2017. A total of 135 of the 650 patients with CSP were involved in the study, among whom 32 became infertile, 78 had an intrauterine pregnancy, and 25 had recurrent CSP after previous CSP. Age (≥35 years; odds ratio [OR], 4.252; p = .002), β-human chorionic gonadotropin (≤5000 mIU/mL; OR, 3.778; p = .011), and longer duration of amenorrhea (>56 days; OR, 2.507; p = .05) were risk factors for infertility. Treatment with UAE (OR, 5.796; p = .003), more abortions (≥4; OR, 2.851; p = .022), and being asymptomatic (OR, 4.175; p = .039) were risk factors for recurrent CSP. There was no statistically significant difference in the subsequent outcomes of pregnant women in the HIFU and UAE groups (p >.05).
Conclusion: More attention should be given to subsequent reproductive outcomes after CSP, not only for intrauterine pregnancy, but also for infertility and recurrent CSP. Early diagnosis and treatment of CSP could reduce the risk of infertility and recurrent CSP. HIFU seemed to be superior to UAE in reducing the risk of recurrent CSP. Patients with CSP should adhere to strict contraception if they do not desire more children.
Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Infertility; Recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy; Risk factors; Uterine artery embolization.
Copyright © 2018 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05376-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 36726079 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(30):e7687. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007687. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28746234 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy.Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(2):144-50. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1104733. Epub 2015 Dec 7. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016. PMID: 26644262 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Jun;30(6):446-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Mar 7. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36893898 Review.
-
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1314-1325. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00959-w. Epub 2019 May 2. Adv Ther. 2019. PMID: 31049875
Cited by
-
Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05376-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 36726079 Free PMC article.
-
Subsequent fertility after cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 11;23(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05584-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37170216 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35907811 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and uterine artery embolization in the management of cervical pregnancy.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 16;9:990066. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.990066. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36186779 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;306(3):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06487-3. Epub 2022 Mar 18. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 35303150
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous