Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):883-890.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 8.

Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Lixing Chen et al. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Study objective: To investigate risk factors for infertility and recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after previous CSP.

Design: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).

Setting: University hospital.

Patients: Between January 2007 and April 2016, a total of 650 patients were included, all diagnosed with CSP and treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and uterine artery embolization (UAE), followed by suction curettage under hysteroscopic guidance.

Intervention: None.

Measurements and main results: Follow-up of the reproductive outcomes ended in June 2017. A total of 135 of the 650 patients with CSP were involved in the study, among whom 32 became infertile, 78 had an intrauterine pregnancy, and 25 had recurrent CSP after previous CSP. Age (≥35 years; odds ratio [OR], 4.252; p = .002), β-human chorionic gonadotropin (≤5000 mIU/mL; OR, 3.778; p = .011), and longer duration of amenorrhea (>56 days; OR, 2.507; p = .05) were risk factors for infertility. Treatment with UAE (OR, 5.796; p = .003), more abortions (≥4; OR, 2.851; p = .022), and being asymptomatic (OR, 4.175; p = .039) were risk factors for recurrent CSP. There was no statistically significant difference in the subsequent outcomes of pregnant women in the HIFU and UAE groups (p >.05).

Conclusion: More attention should be given to subsequent reproductive outcomes after CSP, not only for intrauterine pregnancy, but also for infertility and recurrent CSP. Early diagnosis and treatment of CSP could reduce the risk of infertility and recurrent CSP. HIFU seemed to be superior to UAE in reducing the risk of recurrent CSP. Patients with CSP should adhere to strict contraception if they do not desire more children.

Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Infertility; Recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy; Risk factors; Uterine artery embolization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Substances