Intraoperative ultrasound in breast cancer surgery-from localization of non-palpable tumors to objectively measurable excision
- PMID: 30205823
- PMCID: PMC6134720
- DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1488-1
Intraoperative ultrasound in breast cancer surgery-from localization of non-palpable tumors to objectively measurable excision
Abstract
Background: The utilization of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in breast cancer surgery is a relatively new concept in surgical oncology. Over the last few decades, the field of breast cancer surgery has been striving for a more rational approach, directing its efforts towards removing the tumor entirely yet sparing tissue and structures not infiltrated by tumor cells. Further progress in objectivity and optimization of breast cancer excision is possible if we make the tumor and surrounding tissue visible and measurable in real time, during the course of the operation; IOUS seems to be the optimal solution to this complex requirement. IOUS was introduced into clinical practice as a device for visualization of non-palpable tumors, and compared to wire-guided localization (WGL), IOUS was always at least a viable, or much better alternative, in terms of both precision in identification and resection and for patients' and surgeons' comfort. In recent years, intraoperative ultrasound has been used in the surgery of palpable tumors to optimize resection procedures and overcome the disadvantages of classic palpation guided surgery.
Objective: The aim of this review is to show the role of IOUS in contemporary breast cancer surgery and its changes over time.
Methods: A PubMed database comprehensive search was conducted to identify all relevant articles according to assigned key words.
Conclusion: Over time, the use of IOUS has been transformed from being the means of localizing non-palpable lesions to an instrument yielding a reduced number of positive resection margins, with a smaller volume of healthy breast tissue excided around tumor, by making the excision of the tumor optimal and objectively measurable.
Keywords: Breast cancer excision; Intraoperative ultrasound; Tumor localization.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The manuscript has not been published previously, in any language, in whole or in part, and is not currently under consideration elsewhere.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Excision of Non-Palpable and Palpable Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ultraschall Med. 2022 Aug;43(4):367-379. doi: 10.1055/a-1821-8559. Epub 2022 Jun 27. Ultraschall Med. 2022. PMID: 35760079 English.
-
Surgeon-led Intraoperative Ultrasound Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Cancers: Results of 5 Years of Practice.Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Dec;19(6):e748-e752. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 17. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31208875
-
Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer.Breast. 2013 Aug;22(4):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Oct 27. Breast. 2013. PMID: 23110817
-
Learning curves in intraoperative ultrasound guided surgery in breast cancer based on complete breast cancer excision and no need for second surgeries.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;45(4):578-583. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Feb 1. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30737056
-
The value of ultrasound-guided surgery for breast cancer.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.034. Epub 2017 Aug 2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017. PMID: 28802225 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparative study of learning curves among general surgery residents for intraoperative ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 14;14(1):18881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70040-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39143184 Free PMC article.
-
Breast tumor segmentation in ultrasound using distance-adapted fuzzy connectedness, convolutional neural network, and active contour.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 28;14(1):25859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76308-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39468220 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of ultrasound guided surgery and radio-guided occult lesions localization (ROLL) for nonpalpable breast cancer excision.Gland Surg. 2023 Sep 25;12(9):1233-1241. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-27. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Gland Surg. 2023. PMID: 37842539 Free PMC article.
-
Image-Guided Localization Techniques for Surgical Excision of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: An Overview of Current Literature and Our Experience with Preoperative Skin Tattoo.J Pers Med. 2021 Feb 4;11(2):99. doi: 10.3390/jpm11020099. J Pers Med. 2021. PMID: 33557072 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ultrasound Image Features under Deep Learning in Breast Conservation Surgery for Breast Cancer.J Healthc Eng. 2021 Sep 17;2021:6318936. doi: 10.1155/2021/6318936. eCollection 2021. J Healthc Eng. 2021. PMID: 34567484 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schwartz GF, Goldberg BB, Rifkin MD, D'Orazio SE. Ultrasonography: an alternative to X-ray-guided needle localization of nonpalpable breast masses. Surgery. 1988;104:870–873. - PubMed
-
- Rahusen FD, Taets van Amerongen AH, van Diest PJ, Borgstein PJ, Bleichrodt RP, Meijer S. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancers: a feasibility study looking at the accuracy of obtained margins. J Surg Oncol. 1999;72:72–76. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199910)72:2<72::AID-JSO6>3.0.CO;2-M. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical