Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;31(3):67-72.
doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17051. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

Differential Benefit of Two Different Tooth-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances in Female Subjects

Affiliations

Differential Benefit of Two Different Tooth-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances in Female Subjects

Lale Taner et al. Turk J Orthod. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of tooth-borne acrylic-bonded rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances with or without the anterior teeth anchorage on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures, as well as soft tissues.

Methods: This study included 44 patients who were treated with two different tooth-borne bonded acrylic RME appliances. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before the treatment (T0) and in the post-retention (T1) phase of the RME treatment. The posterior-bonded RME appliance group and full-bonded RME appliance group were created as the two different groups of treatment. The following statistical analyses were performed: intra- and inter-group comparisons were made using the paired t-test, Wilcoxon test, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test for normal and non-normal distribution data.

Results: Significant increases were observed in R1-A, R1-ANS, R1-U1, R1-AR, R1-St, R1-Li, and R1-Pn in both groups. R1-PNS, R1-Ls, R1-Sn, and R1-B' were found to be significantly larger at T1 than at T0 in the posterior-bonded RME appliance group. R2-A, R2-ANS, R2-L1, R2-A', and R2-Pn were significantly larger at T1 than at T0 in the full-bonded RME appliance group. The R2-A' was significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion: The soft tissue A point appears to be the most important differing matter between the two different RME appliances, and a full acrylic-bonded RME appliance may be beneficial for subjects with a maxillary retrognathic profile.

Keywords: Rapid maxillary expansion; growing subjects; soft tissue profile; tooth-borne expander.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1. a, b
Figure 1. a, b
Posterior acrylic-bonded tooth-borne RME (Group1) (a); full acrylic-bonded tooth-borne RME (Group2) (b)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reference line, landmarks, and measurements SNA(°)(1), SNB(°)(2), ANB(°)(3), SN-GoGN(°)(4), R1-A(mm)(5), R1-ANS(mm)(6), R1-PNS(mm)(7), R2-A(mm)(8), R2-ANS(mm)(9), R2-PNS(mm)(10), R1-U1(mm)(11), R2-U1(mm)(12), R1-Ar(mm)(13), R2-Ar(mm)(14), R1-L1(mm)(15), R2-L1(mm)(16), R1-Ls(mm)(17), R1-St(mm)(18), R1-Sn(mm)(19), R1-A′(mm)(20), R1-B′(mm)(21), R1-Li(mm)(22), R1-Pn(mm)(23), R2-Ls(mm)(24), R2-St(mm)(25), R2-Sn(mm)(26), R2-A′(mm)(27), R2-B′(mm)(28), R2-Li(mm)(29), R2-Pn(mm)(30), NLA(°)(31)

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.
    Ugolini A, Agostino P, Silvestrini-Biavati A, Harrison JE, Batista KB. Ugolini A, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 24;12(12):CD000979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000979.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34951927 Free PMC article.

References

    1. da Silva Filho OG, Boas MC, Capelozza Filho L. Rapid maxillary expansion in the primary and mixed dentitions: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:171–9. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81524-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6:25–34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/6.1.25. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:674–85. - PubMed
    1. Angell EC. Irregularities of teeth and their treatment. San Francisco Medical Press. 1860:181–5.
    1. Haas AJ. Rapid Expansion of the Maxillary Dental Arch and Nasal Cavity by Opening the Midpalatal Suture. Angle Orthod. 1961;32:73–89.

LinkOut - more resources