Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018:4:40.
doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2018013. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

Anatomy of posterior cruciate ligament retained in a posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee replacement: a cadaveric study

Affiliations

Anatomy of posterior cruciate ligament retained in a posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee replacement: a cadaveric study

Tarun Goyal et al. SICOT J. 2018.

Abstract

Background: Recent evidence has highlighted a risk that the majority of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is removed while making bone cuts in tibia and femur during total knee replacement surgery. Aim of this cadaveric study is to calculate how much PCL footprint is retained in a PCL retaining prosthesis after routine tibial and femoral cuts are made. Methods: Twelve paired formalin-fixed Indian cadaveric knees were studied. Knees were disarticulated and all soft tissues were circumferentially removed from the tibia and femur. Footprints of antero-lateral and postero-medial bundles were marked on tibia and femur. Proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts were made using standard cutting jigs (Zimmer NexGen LPS). Digital photographs were taken with a magnification marker attached on the bone before and after making the cuts. Area of PCL insertion before and after the bone cuts was measured using software ImageJ (National Institute of Health).

Results: Footprint on tibial side was reduced by 9.1%, and on femoral side by 21.8%. Footprint of AL bundle was reduced by 24.3% on the tibial side and by 15.3% on the femoral side. Footprint of PM bundle on tibia was not affected by the bone cut but was reduced by 18.5% on the femoral side.

Conclusion: Tibial and femoral insertions of PCL are relatively well preserved after bone cuts are made in a posterior cruciate retaining TKR. There is differential sectioning of antero-lateral and postero-medial bundles of PCL on tibial and femoral sides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Footprint of PCL on tibia before bone resection. Antero-lateral bundle is marked with green and postero-medial bundle with red.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Footprint of PCL on tibia after bone resection. Antero-lateral bundle is marked with green and postero-medial bundle with red.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bone cut from proximal tibia. 10 mm of tone is removed from lateral tibial condyle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Footprint of PCL on femur before bone resection. Antero-lateral bundle is marked with green and postero-medial bundle with red.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Footprint of PCL on femur after bone resection. Antero-lateral bundle is marked with green and postero-medial bundle with red.

References

    1. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein A (1982) The posterior stabilised condylar prosthesis: a modification of total condylar design. Two to four year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg 64(9), 1317. - PubMed
    1. Straw R, Kulkarni S, Attfield S, Wilton TJ (2003) Posterior cruciate ligament at total knee replacement. Essential, beneficial or a hindrance? J Bone Joint Surg 85(5), 671–674. - PubMed
    1. Liabaud B, Patrick DA Jr, Geller JA (2013) Is the posterior cruciate ligament destabilized after the tibial cut in a cruciate retaining total knee replacement? Knee 20(6), 412–415. - PubMed
    1. Matziolis G, Mehlhorn S, Schattat N, Diederichs G, Hube R, Perka C (2012) How much of the PCL is really preserved during the tibial cut? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(6), 1083–1086. - PubMed
    1. Shannon FJ, Cronin JJ, Cleary MS, Eustace SJ, O'Byrne JM (2007) The posterior cruciate ligament-preserving total knee replacement: do we preserve it? A radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(6), 766–771. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources