EEG-based auditory attention detection: boundary conditions for background noise and speaker positions
- PMID: 30207293
- DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aae0a6
EEG-based auditory attention detection: boundary conditions for background noise and speaker positions
Abstract
Objective: A listener's neural responses can be decoded to identify the speaker the person is attending to in a cocktail party environment. Such auditory attention detection methods have the potential to provide noise suppression algorithms in hearing devices with information about the listener's attention. A challenge is the effect of noise and other acoustic conditions that can reduce the attention detection accuracy. Specifically, noise can impact the ability of the person to segregate the sound sources and perform selective attention, as well as the external signal processing necessary to decode the attention effectively. The aim of this work is to systematically analyze the effect of noise level and speaker position on attention decoding accuracy.
Approach: 28 subjects participated in the experiment. Auditory stimuli consisted of stories narrated by different speakers from two different locations, along with surrounding multi-talker background babble. EEG signals of the subjects were recorded while they focused on one story and ignored the other. The strength of the babble noise as well as the spatial separation between the two speakers were varied between presentations. Spatio-temporal decoders were trained for each subject, and applied to decode attention of the subjects from every 30 s segment of data. Behavioral speech recognition thresholds were obtained for the different speaker separations.
Main results: Both the background noise level and the angular separation between speakers affected attention decoding accuracy. Remarkably, attention decoding performance was seen to increase with the inclusion of moderate background noise (versus no noise), while across the different noise conditions performance dropped significantly with increasing noise level. We also observed that decoding accuracy improved with increasing speaker separation, exhibiting the advantage of spatial release from masking. Furthermore, the effect of speaker separation on the decoding accuracy became stronger when the background noise level increased. A significant correlation between speech intelligibility and attention decoding accuracy was found across conditions.
Significance: This work shows how the background noise level and relative positions of competing talkers impact attention decoding accuracy. It indicates in which circumstances a neuro-steered noise suppression system may need to operate, in function of acoustic conditions. It also indicates the boundary conditions for the operation of EEG-based attention detection systems in neuro-steered hearing prostheses.
Similar articles
-
Impact of Different Acoustic Components on EEG-Based Auditory Attention Decoding in Noisy and Reverberant Conditions.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Apr;27(4):652-663. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2903404. Epub 2019 Mar 7. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019. PMID: 30843845
-
Adaptive attention-driven speech enhancement for EEG-informed hearing prostheses.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:77-80. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7590644. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016. PMID: 28268285
-
Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.J Neural Eng. 2019 Nov 6;16(6):066033. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab4340. J Neural Eng. 2019. PMID: 31505476
-
Relating EEG to continuous speech using deep neural networks: a review.J Neural Eng. 2023 Aug 3;20(4). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ace73f. J Neural Eng. 2023. PMID: 37442115 Review.
-
The Role of High-Level Processes for Oscillatory Phase Entrainment to Speech Sound.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 2;9:651. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00651. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26696863 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Two-Talker Attention Decoding from EEG with Nonlinear Neural Networks and Linear Methods.Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 8;9(1):11538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47795-0. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31395905 Free PMC article.
-
Neural Representation Enhanced for Speech and Reduced for Background Noise With a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Scheme During a Selective Attention Task.Front Neurosci. 2020 Sep 10;14:846. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00846. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33071722 Free PMC article.
-
A Tutorial on Auditory Attention Identification Methods.Front Neurosci. 2019 Mar 19;13:153. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00153. eCollection 2019. Front Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 30941002 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of an Online Auditory Attention Detection Model with Electroencephalography in a Dichotomous Listening Experiment.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 13;21(2):531. doi: 10.3390/s21020531. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33451041 Free PMC article.
-
A correlation study on EEG signals during visual concentration test and clinical evaluation in schizophrenia patients.BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 5;25(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07237-w. BMC Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40764561 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources