Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov;38(11):991-1000.
doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0701-x.

Safety Profile of High-Dose Botulinum Toxin Type A in Post-Stroke Spasticity Treatment

Affiliations
Review

Safety Profile of High-Dose Botulinum Toxin Type A in Post-Stroke Spasticity Treatment

Alessio Baricich et al. Clin Drug Investig. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of focal post-stroke spasticity (PSS). However, a recently published study estimated that a significant percentage of patients affected by PSS could benefit from higher doses of BoNT-A than those permitted by current directives in the countries studied. Several studies have reported the use of high doses of BoNT-A in the management of patients affected by severe PSS; however, the most important adverse effect of this drug might be systemic diffusion of the toxin, which could potentially be related to its dose. Even if systemic toxicity is a rare event, fear of systemic toxicity is still the most relevant concern regarding use of high doses. The aim of our narrative review was to show the state of the art on the use of high doses of BoNT-A in patients affected by PSS in order to define the safety profile, focusing on both clinical and instrumental assessment of systemic effects. Current evidence from the literature suggests that higher doses of BoNT-A are effective in reducing spasticity of upper and lower limbs after stroke, with rare occurrence of mild adverse effects. The use of high doses seems to be an effective and safe therapeutic option to reduce multifocal or generalized PSS in selected patients. In particular, the potential role of higher doses in order to improve the functional outcome of these patients should be noted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lundström E, Smits A, Borg J, Terént A. Four-fold increase in direct costs of stroke survivors with spasticity compared with stroke survivors without spasticity: the first year after the event. Stroke. 2010;41(2):319–24. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wissel J, Manack A, Brainin M. Toward an epidemiology of post stroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013;80(3 Suppl 2):S13–9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Denno MS, Gillard PJ, Graham GD, DiBonaventura MD, Goren A, Varon SF, et al. Anxiety and depression associated with caregiver burden in caregivers of stroke survivors with spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(9):1731–6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santamato A, Micello MF, Ranieri M, Valeno G, Albano A, Baricich A, et al. Employment of higher doses of botulinum toxin type A to reduce spasticity after stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2015;350(1–2):1–6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santamato A, Panza F. Benefits and risks of non-approved injection regimens for botulinum toxins in spasticity. Drugs. 2017;77(13):1413–22. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources