Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan 15;58(2):159-166.
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1146-18. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Vonoprazan Plus Rebamipide and Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Gastric Ulcer Healing Induced by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Vonoprazan Plus Rebamipide and Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Gastric Ulcer Healing Induced by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Takashi Ichida et al. Intern Med. .

Abstract

Objective Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently a standard procedure, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are most commonly used to treat post-ESD ulcers. Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), reportedly inhibits gastric acid secretions more effectively than PPIs. Combination therapy of a PPI plus rebamipide is effective for treating larger ulcers. Our goal was to evaluate the effects of vonoprazan plus rebamipide compared to esomeprazole plus rebamipide for the treatment of post-ESD ulcers. Methods First, vonoprazan plus rebamipide (V group) or esomeprazole plus rebamipide (E group) was orally administered to subjects for eight weeks. We then evaluated the ulcer healing process at four and eight weeks after the procedure using a gastric ulcer stage system and by measuring the ulcer size. Patients A total of 84 patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms between September 2015 and December 2017 in Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital were included in this randomized controlled trial. Results The ulcer scar rates at week 4 in the V group (n=43) and E groups (n=39) were 20.9% and 15.4%, while those at week 8 were 90.7% and 92.3%, respectively. The ulcer reduction rates at week 4 in the V and E groups were 94.6% and 93.8%, and those at week 8 were 99.7% and 99.3%, respectively. The ulcer scar rates and reduction rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Combination therapy consisting of vonoprazan plus rebamipide was not superior to that of esomeprazole plus rebamipide for post-ESD ulcer healing (UMIN000019516).

Keywords: artificial ulcer; endoscopic submucosal dissection; esomeprazole; gastric intraepithelial neoplasm; ulcer healing; vonoprazan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Treatment protocol.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The pictures of ESD process are shown. The lesion, an early gastric cancer, macroscopic type 0 IIa, 15mm in diameter, is located on the anterior wall in lower third (a). The markings are placed aroud the lesion (b). Hyaluronic acid solution was injected into the submucosal layer, then the mucosal layer is cut around markings (c). The submucosal layer is cut by the endoscopic knife (d). The ESD-induced ulcer was carefully examined, and any visible vessels were coagulated by homeostatic (e). The specimen is attached by pins, and measured the size (f).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Measurement of ulcer size.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Flow chart of study design and patient selection outcome.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Reduction rates of gastric ulcers at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the ESD. The ulcer reduction rates at week 4 in the V and E groups were 94.6% (95% confidence interval, 91.7-95.8%) and 93.8% (95% confidence interval, 92.1-97.2%) and those at week 8 were 99.7% (95% confidence interval, 99.2-100.2%) and 99.3% (95% confidence interval, 98.2-100.2%), respectively.

References

    1. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, et al. . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48: 225-229, 2001. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kakushima N, Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, et al. . The healing process of gastric artificial ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 16: 327-331, 2004.
    1. Kakushima N, Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, et al. . Helicobactor pylori status and the extent of gastric atorotphy do not affect ulcer healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21: 1586-1589, 2006. - PubMed
    1. Oh TH, Jung HY, Choi KD, et al. . Degree of healing and healing-associated factors of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers after pantoprazole therapy for four weeks. Dig Dis Sci 54: 1494-1499, 2009. - PubMed
    1. Kato T, Araki H, Onogi F, et al. . Clinical trial: rebamipide promotes gastric ulcer healing by proton pump inhibitor after endoscopic submucosal dissection-a randomized controlled study. J Gastroenterol 45: 285-290, 2010. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms