Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2018 Aug 28:6:228.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00228. eCollection 2018.

Study Protocol: Determining Research Priorities of Young Albertan Families (The Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting Project-FRAISE)-Participatory Action Research

Affiliations
Case Reports

Study Protocol: Determining Research Priorities of Young Albertan Families (The Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting Project-FRAISE)-Participatory Action Research

Katherine S Bright et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy and childrearing can be an exciting and stressful time for new parents. The maternal-child health landscape has changed dramatically over the last few decades and research priorities need to address these rapid changes. There have been limited attempts to engage and collaborate with members of the public to develop research priorities for families who are expecting or parenting an infant to age 24 months. The work that has been completed has attempted to identify parental preference for information delivery and barriers to uptake of parenting programs but has not investigated parental research priorities. Methods: In collaboration with provincial research units and strategic clinical networks (SCN), we will use principles of participatory action research (PAR) as our theoretical framework/method, and a modified James Lind Alliance priority setting approach to prioritize a list of research questions that parents/knowledge users believe will support the health of their families. This will result in a top 10 list of parent/knowledge user-identified research priorities. This project will consist of three phases. In the first phase, we developed a steering committee of parents/knowledge users, healthcare providers, community agencies, and researchers to design a survey about health priorities for families. In the second phase, we will distribute the survey to diverse groups of parents/knowledge users/providers and hold a series of meetings to identify and prioritize potential questions from new parents about health issues from conception to age 24 months. In the third phase, we will collaboratively disseminate and translate findings. Discussion: This study will highlight parental health concerns and recommend parent-identified research priorities to inform future research projects needed to support the health of families between conception to age 24 months. Understanding the health research priorities of families in the community will help ensure future research contributes to meaningful changes in the health of young children, parents/knowledge users, and families. Ethics: This study and protocol have received ethical approved from the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (REB17-0014). Dissemination: The top 10 research priorities will be published and additional findings from the study will be distributed through pamphlets and newsletters.

Keywords: family research agenda-setting initiative; health research priorities of families; parent/knowledge user-identified research priorities; parental health concerns; participatory action research; pregnancy and childrearing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
International Association of Public Participation (IAP2) public participation spectrum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) program logic model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shonkoff JP. Capitalizing on advances in science to reduce the health consequences of early childhood adversity. JAMA Pediatr. (2016) 170:1003–7. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1559 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LC, Andersen CT, DiGirolamo AM, Lu C, et al. . Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet (2017) 389:77–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bronfenbrenner U. Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; (2005).
    1. Britto PR, Lye SJ, Proulx K, Yousafzai AK, Matthews SG, Vaivada T, et al. . Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development. Lancet (2017) 389:91–102. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richter LM, Daelmans B, Lombardi J, Heymann J, Boo FL, Behrman JR, et al. . Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development. Lancet (2017) 389:103–18. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31698-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources