Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;6(15):303.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.06.49.

Prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in T3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Yu-Shang Yang  1 , Yun-Cang Wang  2 , Han-Yu Deng  1 , Yong Yuan  1 , Zhi-Qiang Wang  3 , Du He  4 , Long-Qi Chen  1
Affiliations

Prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in T3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Yu-Shang Yang et al. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The prognostic value of positive circumferential resection margins (CRM) in resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unclear. The Royal College of Pathologists criteria and the College of American Pathologists criteria are the two commonly used definitions of CRM involvement. The aim of this report was to compare the prognostic performance of the two criteria and to propose a modified stratification in patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for ESCC.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 112 patients with pathologically confirmed T3N0M0 ESCC and without neoadjuvant therapy from June 2009 and July 2011. The optimal cutoff point was obtained by the X-tile. The prognostic performance of different classifications of CRM was assessed in terms of homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity.

Results: According to the Royal College of Pathologists criteria, a positive CRM was detected in 87 patients (77.7%); and 24 patients (21.4%) were found with positive CRM according to the College of American Pathologists criteria. Non-significant associations between overall survival and CRM were observed according to either of the two criteria. The analysis of reclassifying the CRM criteria demonstrated that the optimal cutoff CRM value for best prognostic power was 600 µm. Patients with CRM more than 600 µm showed better overall survival (P<0.05) than the cases with CRM less than 600 µm. Furthermore, the improved homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity gradients were also found in this modified criteria, as compared with the two existing criteria.

Conclusions: Our study highlighted that CRM was an independent prognostic factor for survival in esophageal cancer patients, and the modified CRM criteria had better prognostic power than the traditional criteria in patients with ESCC.

Keywords: College of American Pathologists Criteria; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); Royal College of Pathologists Criteria; circumferential resection margin (CRM).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival according to RCP criteria. RCP, Royal College of Pathologists.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival according to CAP criteria. CAP, College of American Pathologists.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cutoff points produced by X-tile plot.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival according to modified criteria.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang YC, Deng HY, Wang WP, et al. Positive esophageal proximal resection margin: an important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer that warrants adjuvant therapy. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:2512-8. 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.61 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mariette C, Castel B, Balon JM, et al. Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:588-93. 10.1016/S0748-7983(03)00109-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghadban T, Reeh M, Koenig AM, et al. Prognostic Significant or Not? The Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: Impact on Local Recurrence and Overall Survival in Patients Without Neoadjuvant Treatment. Ann Surg 2017;266:988-94. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001995 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee GD, Lee SE, Kim KM, et al. New 3-Tiered Circumferential Resection Margin Criteria in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg 2015;262:965-71. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karstens KF, Izbicki JR, Reeh M. Does the Margin Matter in Esophageal Cancer? Dig Surg 2018;35:196-203. 10.1159/000478669 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources