Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;6(9):E1149-E1156.
doi: 10.1055/a-0655-1987. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type

Affiliations

Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type

Isabel Portillo et al. Endosc Int Open. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Background and study aims To compare the quality of colonoscopy in a population-based coordinated program of colorectal cancer screening according to type of hospital (academic or non-academic). Patients and methods Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT (≥ 20 ug Hb/g feces) between January 2009 and September 2016 were prospectively included at five academic and seven non-academic public hospitals. Screening colonoscopy quality indicators considered were adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, complications and bowel preparation quality. Results A total of 48,759 patients underwent colonoscopy, 34,616 (80 %) in academic hospitals and 14,143 in non-academic hospitals. Among these cases, 19,942 (37.1 %) advanced adenomas and 2,607 (5.3 %) colorectal cancers (CRCs) were detected, representing a total of 22,549 (46.2 %) cases of advanced neoplasia. The adenoma detection rate was 64 %, 63.1 % in academic hospitals and 66.4 % in non-academic hospitals ( P < 0.001). Rates of advanced adenoma detection, cecal intubation and adequate colonic preparation were 45.8 %, 96.2 % and 88.3 %, respectively, and in all cases were lower (implying worse quality care) in academic hospitals (45.3 % vs 48.7 %; odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.84 - 0.91; 95.9 % vs 97 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.38 - 0.69; and 86.4 % vs 93 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.45 - 0.5; respectively; P < 0.001 in all cases). In 13 patients, all in the academic hospital group, CRC was diagnosed after colonoscopy (0.26 cases × 1000 colonoscopies). Rates of CRC treated by endoscopy were similar in both types of hospital (30 %). The rate of severe complication was 1.2 % (602 patients), with no significant differences by hospital type: bleeding occurred in 1/147 colonoscopies and perforation in 1/329. One patient died within 30 days after screening colonoscopy. Conclusions The quality of colonoscopy was better in non-academic hospitals. The rate of detection of advanced neoplasia was higher in non-academic hospitals and correlated with the rate of post-colonoscopy CRC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Departamento de Sanidad y Consumo Cancer in the Basque Country. Incidence, mortality, survival and their trends Gasteiz: 20101stedn.http://www.osakidetza.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/estado_salud/es...
    1. GLOBOCAN Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012 http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx[Available: 2016-08-19]
    1. Kaminski M F, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al.Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803. - PubMed
    1. Jover R, Herráiz M, Alarcón O et al.Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy. 2012;44:444–451. - PubMed
    1. EUSKOLON Group . Arana-Arri E, Idigoras I, Uranga B et al.Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex? BMC Cancer. 2017;17:577. - PMC - PubMed