Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
- PMID: 30211306
- PMCID: PMC6133681
- DOI: 10.1055/a-0655-1987
Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
Abstract
Background and study aims To compare the quality of colonoscopy in a population-based coordinated program of colorectal cancer screening according to type of hospital (academic or non-academic). Patients and methods Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT (≥ 20 ug Hb/g feces) between January 2009 and September 2016 were prospectively included at five academic and seven non-academic public hospitals. Screening colonoscopy quality indicators considered were adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, complications and bowel preparation quality. Results A total of 48,759 patients underwent colonoscopy, 34,616 (80 %) in academic hospitals and 14,143 in non-academic hospitals. Among these cases, 19,942 (37.1 %) advanced adenomas and 2,607 (5.3 %) colorectal cancers (CRCs) were detected, representing a total of 22,549 (46.2 %) cases of advanced neoplasia. The adenoma detection rate was 64 %, 63.1 % in academic hospitals and 66.4 % in non-academic hospitals ( P < 0.001). Rates of advanced adenoma detection, cecal intubation and adequate colonic preparation were 45.8 %, 96.2 % and 88.3 %, respectively, and in all cases were lower (implying worse quality care) in academic hospitals (45.3 % vs 48.7 %; odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.84 - 0.91; 95.9 % vs 97 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.38 - 0.69; and 86.4 % vs 93 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.45 - 0.5; respectively; P < 0.001 in all cases). In 13 patients, all in the academic hospital group, CRC was diagnosed after colonoscopy (0.26 cases × 1000 colonoscopies). Rates of CRC treated by endoscopy were similar in both types of hospital (30 %). The rate of severe complication was 1.2 % (602 patients), with no significant differences by hospital type: bleeding occurred in 1/147 colonoscopies and perforation in 1/329. One patient died within 30 days after screening colonoscopy. Conclusions The quality of colonoscopy was better in non-academic hospitals. The rate of detection of advanced neoplasia was higher in non-academic hospitals and correlated with the rate of post-colonoscopy CRC.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.Endoscopy. 2015 Aug;47(8):703-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391968. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Endoscopy. 2015. PMID: 26090725
-
Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097. Epub 2015 Dec 16. Gut. 2017. PMID: 26674360 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term performance of colorectal cancerscreening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test.Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2124-2130. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314753. Epub 2017 Nov 3. Gut. 2018. PMID: 29101260
-
Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec 16;6(12):571-83. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i12.571. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014. PMID: 25512766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1661-1674.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Gastroenterology. 2019. PMID: 30738046
Cited by
-
Adverse events of colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer screening program with fecal immunochemical testing: a population-based observational study.Endosc Int Open. 2021 Feb;9(2):E224-E232. doi: 10.1055/a-1324-2763. Epub 2021 Feb 3. Endosc Int Open. 2021. PMID: 33553585 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits, burden, and harms of computer aided polyp detection with artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening: microsimulation modelling study.BMJ Med. 2025 Mar 27;4(1):e001446. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001446. eCollection 2025 Jan. BMJ Med. 2025. PMID: 40166696 Free PMC article.
-
Interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program.Endoscopy. 2023 Dec;55(12):1061-1069. doi: 10.1055/a-2136-6564. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Endoscopy. 2023. PMID: 37793423 Free PMC article.
-
The "Sweet Spot" Revisited: Optimal Recall Rates for Cancer Detection With 2D and 3D Digital Screening Mammography in the Metro Chicago Breast Cancer Registry.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):894-902. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22429. Epub 2021 Feb 10. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021. PMID: 33566635 Free PMC article.
-
Colonoscopy quality in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities in Korea.Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(Suppl 1):S35-S43. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.117. Epub 2020 May 12. Korean J Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 32388944 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Departamento de Sanidad y Consumo Cancer in the Basque Country. Incidence, mortality, survival and their trends Gasteiz: 20101stedn.http://www.osakidetza.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/estado_salud/es...
-
- GLOBOCAN Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012 http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx[Available: 2016-08-19]
-
- Kaminski M F, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al.Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803. - PubMed
-
- Jover R, Herráiz M, Alarcón O et al.Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy. 2012;44:444–451. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources