Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 13;8(1):13743.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31920-6.

A machine learning approach to estimating preterm infants survival: development of the Preterm Infants Survival Assessment (PISA) predictor

Affiliations

A machine learning approach to estimating preterm infants survival: development of the Preterm Infants Survival Assessment (PISA) predictor

Marco Podda et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Estimation of mortality risk of very preterm neonates is carried out in clinical and research settings. We aimed at elaborating a prediction tool using machine learning methods. We developed models on a cohort of 23747 neonates <30 weeks gestational age, or <1501 g birth weight, enrolled in the Italian Neonatal Network in 2008-2014 (development set), using 12 easily collected perinatal variables. We used a cohort from 2015-2016 (N = 5810) as a test set. Among several machine learning methods we chose artificial Neural Networks (NN). The resulting predictor was compared with logistic regression models. In the test cohort, NN had a slightly better discrimination than logistic regression (P < 0.002). The differences were greater in subgroups of neonates (at various gestational age or birth weight intervals, singletons). Using a cutoff of death probability of 0.5, logistic regression misclassified 67/5810 neonates (1.2 percent) more than NN. In conclusion our study - the largest published so far - shows that even in this very simplified scenario, using only limited information available up to 5 minutes after birth, a NN approach had a small but significant advantage over current approaches. The software implementing the predictor is made freely available to the community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plot of the observed mortality vs. mortality predicted by the two best-scoring models (PISA and Logistic2), per gestational week, in the test dataset (2015–2016).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The International Neonatal Network The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units. Lancet. 1993;342:193–198. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92296-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parry G, Tucker J, Tarnow-Mordi W. CRIB II: an update of the Clinical Risk Index for Babies score; UK Neonatal Staffing Study Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2003;361:1789–91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13397-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJE, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: Simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J. Pediatr. 2001;138:92–100. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.109608. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Medlock S, Ravelli ACJ, Tamminga P, Mol BWM, Abu-Hanna A. Prediction of Mortality in Very Premature Infants: A Systematic Review of Prediction Models. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023441. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patrick S, Schumacher RE, Davis M. Methods of Mortality Risk Adjustment in the NICU: A 20-Year Review. Pediatrics. 2013;131(1):S68–74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1427h. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types