Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 22:12:179.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00179. eCollection 2018.

Moral Violations and the Experience of Disgust and Anger

Affiliations

Moral Violations and the Experience of Disgust and Anger

Megan Oaten et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

Disgust is a natural defensive emotion that has evolved to protect against potential sources of contamination and has been recently linked to moral judgements in many studies. However, that people often report feelings of disgust when thinking about feces or moral transgressions alike does not necessarily mean that the same mechanisms mediate these reactions. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (n = 22) to investigate whether core and moral disgusts entrain common neural systems. We provide evidence that: (i) activation of overlapping brain regions between core and moral disgust is the result of content overlap in the vignettes-core disgust elicitors-across conditions, and not from moral violations per se, and (ii) moral residue (i.e., the remaining or "residual" activation after the influence of core disgust elicitors have been taken into account) produced a pattern of activation that is more consistent with moral anger, than one of "residual disgust." These findings run contrary to the premise that our "moral center" is connected to the area of the brain in which physical revulsion is located.

Keywords: anger; disgust; fMRI; moral disgust; moral violations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Contrasts from fMRI data. Moral disgust vs. matched disgust contrast (A), high disgust vs. matched disgust contrast (B), moral disgust vs. high disgust contrast (C), and overlay of the three disgust contrasts (D). Different to Legend color (i.e., yellow) in lower right panel shows the overlap of the three disgust contrasts. Legend shows T-value of the contrasts (e.g., higher T-value represents stronger activations).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Contrasts from fMRI data. High disgust vs. anger contrast (A), matched disgust vs. anger contrast (B), and moral disgust vs. anger contrast (C).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Calder A. J. (2003). Disgust discussed. Ann. Neurol. 53, 427–428. 10.1002/ana.10565 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Case T. I., Oaten M., Stevenson R. J. (2012). Disgust and moral judgment, in Emotions, Imagination, and Moral Reasoning, eds Langdon R., Mackenzie C. (New York, NY: Psychology Press; ), 195–218.
    1. Chapman H. A., Kim D. A., Susskind J. M., Anderson A. K. (2009). In bad taste: evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science 323, 1222–1226 10.1126/science.1165565 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curtis V. (2011). Why disgust matters. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366, 3478–3490. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0165 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gutierrez R., Giner-Sorolla R. (2007). Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking behaviors. Emotion 7, 853–868. 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.853 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources