Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;43(6):1487-1493.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4148-8. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

The pararectus approach for internal fixation of acetabular fractures involving the anterior column: evaluating the functional outcome

Affiliations

The pararectus approach for internal fixation of acetabular fractures involving the anterior column: evaluating the functional outcome

Christian von Rüden et al. Int Orthop. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Aim of this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was to evaluate the functional mid-term outcome two years after open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures involving the anterior column with affection of the quadrilateral plate using the pararectus approach on a large cohort.

Method: Fifty-two patients (12 female, 40 male) with a median age of 55 (range 18-90) years and displaced acetabular fractures involving the anterior column were surgically treated in a single level I trauma centre between July 2012 and February 2016 using the pararectus approach. Thirty-four patients (8 female and 26 male) with a median age of 58 (range 20-85) years were available for complete clinical follow-up at regular intervals, finally 24 months post-operatively. Functional outcome was evaluated according to modified Merle d'Aubigné score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, WOMAC, and SF-36.

Results: Range of time between trauma and surgical treatment was three (range 0-19) days. Operation time was 140 (range 60-240) minutes, and duration of hospital treatment was 19 (range 7-38) days. Functional results in 34 patients available for final follow-up demonstrated 68 points (median; range 39-80) according to the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, 6% according to the WOMAC (mean; SD ± 14.5%), and 69% (mean; SD ± 20.1%) according to the SF-36. The modified Merle d'Aubigné score was excellent in 22 patients, good in eight patients, and fair in four patients.

Discussion/conclusion: Based on the good to excellent functional mid-term follow-up results of this study, the pararectus approach can be recommended as sufficient alternative single access to address displaced acetabular fractures involving the anterior column, independent of patients' age.

Keywords: Acetabular fracture; Ilioinguinal approach; Lower extremity functional scale; Merle d’Aubigné; Outcome; Pararectus approach; Quadrilateral plate; SF-36; Stoppa approach; WOMAC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Both column acetabular fracture with dislocation of the quadrilateral plate and impaction of the acetabular dome
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Surgical access using the pararectus approach: the incision (dotted line) starts cranially at the junction of the lateral and middle thirds of the line connecting the umbilicus with the anterior superior iliac spine. The incision ends at the border between the middle and medial thirds of the line connecting the anterior superior iliac spine with the symphysis. If necessary, an extension of the incision is possible (extended dotted line)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Retraction of mobilized external iliac vessels (A) provides optimal visualization of the pelvic brim and the quadrilateral plate (B). The direct intraoperative view into the fracture gap (C) facilitates anatomical fracture reduction
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Post-operative X-ray demonstrates the fracture reduced anatomically using a small fragment plate (Stryker PRO system, Stryker Corp., Kalamazoo, MI, USA) on the pelvic brim and quadrilateral plate without any step or gap

References

    1. Letournel E. The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;292:62–76. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199307000-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, et al. Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:229–236. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.24056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM. Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1559–1567. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00444. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferguson TA, Patel R, Bhandari M, et al. Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:250–257. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22488. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MRW, Papakostidis C, et al. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):2–9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B1.15605. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources