Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;39(1):15-22.
doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.1.15.

Progress in Automated Urinalysis

Affiliations
Review

Progress in Automated Urinalysis

Matthijs Oyaert et al. Ann Lab Med. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

New technological advances have paved the way for significant progress in automated urinalysis. Quantitative reading of urinary test strips using reflectometry has become possible, while complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology has enhanced analytical sensitivity and shown promise in microalbuminuria testing. Microscopy-based urine particle analysis has greatly progressed over the past decades, enabling high throughput in clinical laboratories. Urinary flow cytometry is an alternative for automated microscopy, and more thorough analysis of flow cytometric data has enabled rapid differentiation of urinary microorganisms. Integration of dilution parameters (e.g., creatinine, specific gravity, and conductivity) in urine test strip readers and urine particle flow cytometers enables correction for urinary dilution, which improves result interpretation. Automated urinalysis can be used for urinary tract screening and for diagnosing and monitoring a broad variety of nephrological and urological conditions; newer applications show promising results for early detection of urothelial cancer. Concomitantly, the introduction of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has enabled fast identification of urinary pathogens. Automation and workflow simplification have led to mechanical integration of test strip readers and particle analysis in urinalysis. As the information obtained by urinalysis is complex, the introduction of expert systems may further reduce analytical errors and improve the quality of sediment and test strip analysis. With the introduction of laboratory-on-a-chip approaches and the use of microfluidics, new affordable applications for quantitative urinalysis and readout on cell phones may become available. In this review, we present the main recent developments in automated urinalysis and future perspectives.

Keywords: Automated microscopy; Flow cytometry; Laboratory on a chip; Microfluidics; Test strip analysis; Urinalysis; Urinary tract infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are reported.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hannemann-Pohl K. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture) Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37:753–764. - PubMed
    1. Fogazzi GB, Garigali G. The different ways to obtain digital images of urine microscopy findings: their advantages and limitations. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;466:160–161. - PubMed
    1. Langlois MR, Delanghe JR, Steyaert SR, Everaert KC, De Buyzere ML. Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis. Clin Chem. 1999;45:118–122. - PubMed
    1. Penders J, Fiers T, Delanghe JR. Quantitative evaluation of urinalysis test strips. Clin Chem. 2002;48:2236–2241. - PubMed
    1. Kubelka P, Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farbanstriche MF. A contribution to the optics of paints. Z Tech Phys. 1931;12:593–601.