Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;29(3):328-344.
doi: 10.1177/1049732318798358. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Wandering as a Sociomaterial Practice: Extending the Theorization of GPS Tracking in Cognitive Impairment

Affiliations

Wandering as a Sociomaterial Practice: Extending the Theorization of GPS Tracking in Cognitive Impairment

Joseph Wherton et al. Qual Health Res. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Electronic tracking through global positioning systems (GPSs) is used to monitor people with cognitive impairment who "wander" outside the home. This ethnographic study explored how GPS-monitored wandering was experienced by individuals, lay carers, and professional staff. Seven in-depth case studies revealed that wandering was often an enjoyable and worthwhile activity and helped deal with uncertainty and threats to identity. In what were typically very complex care contexts, GPS devices were useful to the extent that they aligned with a wider sociomaterial care network that included lay carers, call centers, and health and social care professionals. In this context, "safe" wandering was a collaborative accomplishment that depended on the technology's materiality, affordances, and aesthetic properties; a distributed knowledge of the individual and the places they wandered through, and a collective and dynamic interpretation of risk. Implications for design and delivery of GPS devices and services for cognitive impairment are discussed.

Keywords: GPS tracking; United Kingdom; action research; cognitive impairment; ethnography; qualitative; social practice; sociotechnical practice; structuration theory; wandering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Algase D. L., Moore D. H., Vandeweerd C., Gavin-Dreschnack D. J. (2007). Mapping the maze of terms and definitions in dementia-related wandering. Aging & Mental Health, 11, 686–698. doi:10.1080/13607860701366434 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbalet J. M. (1999). Boredom and social meaning. The British Journal of Sociology, 50, 631–646. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00631.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauman Z. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust: Cambridge, Polity Press.
    1. Beck U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
    1. Bijker W. E., Law J. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Publication types

MeSH terms