Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 13;7(9):151.
doi: 10.3390/foods7090151.

"Seeing What's Left": The Effect of Position of Transparent Windows on Product Evaluation

Affiliations

"Seeing What's Left": The Effect of Position of Transparent Windows on Product Evaluation

Gregory Simmonds et al. Foods. .

Abstract

The position of design elements on product packaging has been shown to exert a measurable impact on consumer perception across a number of different studies and product categories. Design elements previously found to influence the consumer through their positioning on the front of pack include product imagery, brand logos, text-based claims, and basic shapes. However, as yet, no empirical research has focused specifically on the relative position of transparent windows; despite the latter being an increasingly prevalent element of many modern packaging designs. This exploratory online study details an experimental investigation of how manipulating the position of a transparent window on a range of visually-presented, novel packaging designs influences consumer evaluations and judgements of the product seen within. Specifically, 110 participants rated 24 different packaging designs (across four product categories: granola, boxed chocolates, pasta, and lemon mousse; each with six window positions: in one of the four quadrants, the top half, or the bottom half) in a within-participants experimental design. Analyses were conducted using Friedman's tests and Hochberg procedure-adjusted Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests. Window position was found to be a non-trivial element of design, with a general preference for windows on the right-hand side being evidenced. Significantly higher scores for expected product tastiness and design attractiveness were consistently identified across all product categories when windows were positioned on the right- vs. left-hand side of the packaging. Effects on the perception of powerfulness, overall liking, quality, and willingness to purchase were identified, but were inconsistent across the different product categories. Very few effects of window verticality were identified, with expected weight of the product not being significantly influenced by window position. The implications of these findings for academics, designers, and brand managers are discussed, with future research directions highlighted.

Keywords: expected taste; food judgements; packaging; packaging design; position; transparent packaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The experimental stimuli shown to participants. The four categories of product (granola, chocolates, lemon mousse, and pasta) are shown with the six possible window positions and sizes (4 quarter- and 2 half-window positions).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean difference between window positions, by measure, clustered by product category. (a) The average effect of horizontal window position (average score for left-aligned windows, minus average score for right-aligned windows; i.e., a negative difference shows a higher average score from the stimuli with right-aligned windows), using mean differences from the 4-position stimulus set; (b) the average effect of vertical position (average score for top-aligned windows, minus average score for bottom-aligned windows; i.e., a negative difference shows a higher average score from the stimuli with bottom-aligned windows), using mean differences from the 4-position stimulus set; and (c) the average effect of vertical position (as above) using mean differences from the 2-position stimulus set. Error bars show the 95% confidence interval about the mean.

References

    1. Food Marketing Institute Supermarket Facts. [(accessed on 16 July 2018)]; Available online: https://www.fmi.org/our-research/supermarket-facts.
    1. Spence C. Integrating the Packaging and Product Experience in Food and Beverages. Elsevier; Oxford, UK: 2016. Multisensory packaging design: Colour, shape, texture, sound, and smell; pp. 1–22.
    1. Stoll M., Baecke S., Kenning P. What they see is what they get? An fMRI-study on neural correlates of attractive packaging. J. Consum. Behav. 2008;7:342–359. doi: 10.1002/cb.256. - DOI
    1. Velasco C., Salgado-Montejo A., Marmolejo-Ramos F., Spence C. Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014;34:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.12.005. - DOI
    1. Vilnai-Yavetz I., Koren R. Cutting through the clutter: Purchase intentions as a function of packaging instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 2013;23:394–417. doi: 10.1080/09593969.2013.792743. - DOI