Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct;42(6):381-385.
doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

An ethically-justifiable, practical approach to decision-making surrounding conjoined-twin separation

Affiliations
Review

An ethically-justifiable, practical approach to decision-making surrounding conjoined-twin separation

Alana Thomas et al. Semin Perinatol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Conjoined twins present unique ethical and palliative care challenges. We present an ethically-justifiable, practical approach to decision-making with regards to surgical separation. These decisions must account for the short- and long-term prognoses for each infant prior to, and after, separation. Other considerations include the benefits and burdens of separation and the family's values and goals. Caregivers should recognize that decisions surrounding separation may be unduly influenced by social biases. The palliative care team aids in developing goals of care to guide decision-making by promoting communication between the medical team and family. They play an important role in supporting families regardless of the planned course of treatment. This support may be social or spiritual in nature, and is promoted by the interdisciplinary structure of the team. Early involvement of palliative care services facilitates complex decision making and can aid in the transition from cure-oriented therapies to support if needed during and after the dying process.

Keywords: Complex decision making; Conjoined twins; Ethics; Interdisciplinary team; Neonatology; Palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wolfe J, Hinds PS, Sourkes BM. Textbook of interdisciplinary pediatric palliative care. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011.
    1. Collins RT, Bhatti TR, Huff DS, Weinberg PM. Thoracopagus conjoined twins. Circulation. 2008;118:1496. - PubMed
    1. London AJ. The Maltese conjoined twins: two views of their separation. Hastings Cent Rep. 2001;31(1):48–52. - PubMed
    1. Wenkel DH. Separation of conjoined twins and the principle of double effect. Christ Bioeth. 2006;12:291–300. - PubMed
    1. Kopelman LM. The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. J Med Philos. 1997;22(3):271–289. - PubMed

MeSH terms