Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):716.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3518-7.

Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review

Janine Matus  1 , Ashlea Walker  2 , Sharon Mickan  2   3
Affiliations

Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review

Janine Matus et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Building the capacity of allied health professionals to engage in research has been recognised as a priority due to the many benefits it brings for patients, healthcare professionals, healthcare organisations and society more broadly. There is increasing recognition of the need for a coordinated multi-strategy approach to building research capacity. The aim of this systematic review was to identify existing integrated models and frameworks which guide research capacity building for allied health professionals working in publicly funded secondary and tertiary healthcare organisations.

Methods: A systematic review was undertaken searching five databases (Medline, CINAHL, Embase, AustHealth and Web of Science) using English language restrictions. Two authors independently screened and reviewed studies, extracted data and performed quality assessments using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Content and thematic analysis methods were used to code and categorise the data.

Results: A total of 8492 unique records were screened by title and abstract, of which 20 were reviewed in full-text. One quantitative study and five qualitative studies were included, each of which describing a research capacity building framework. Three interconnected and interdependent themes were identified as being essential for research capacity building, including 'supporting clinicians in research', 'working together' and 'valuing research for excellence'.

Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review have been synthesised to develop a succinct and integrated framework for research capacity building which is relevant for allied health professionals working in publicly funded secondary and tertiary healthcare organisations. This framework provides further evidence to suggest that research capacity building strategies are interlinked and interdependent and should be implemented as part of an integrated 'whole of system' approach, with commitment and support from all levels of leadership and management. Future directions for research include using behaviour change and knowledge translation theories to guide the implementation and evaluation of this new framework.

Trial registration: The protocol for this systematic review has been registered with PROSPERO. The registration number is CRD42018087476 .

Keywords: Allied health; Framework; Research activity; Research capacity building; Research culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of process to identify eligible studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. McKeon S, Alexander E, Brodaty H, Ferris B, Frazer I, Little M. Canberra: commonwealth of Australia. 2013. Strategic review of health and medical research in Australia–better health through research; pp. 1–304.
    1. Holden L, Pager S, Golenko X, Ware RS. Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels. Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(1):62–67. doi: 10.1071/PY10081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trostle J. Research capacity building in international health: definitions, evaluations and strategies for success. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(11):1321–1324. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90035-O. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turnbull Catherine, Grimmer-Somers Karen, Kumar Saravana, May Esther, Law Deborah, Ashworth Elaine. Allied, scientific and complementary health professionals: a new model for Australian allied health. Australian Health Review. 2009;33(1):27. doi: 10.1071/AH090027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lizarondo L, Grimmer-Somers K, Kumar S. A systematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011;4:261–272. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S23144. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources