Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct:215:92-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.031. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

Investigating inequities in hospital care among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals using social media

Affiliations

Investigating inequities in hospital care among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals using social media

Yulin Hswen et al. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Rationale: Persons who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) face health inequities due to unwarranted discrimination against their sexual orientation or identity. An important contributor to LGBT health disparities is the inequitable or substandard care that LGBT individuals receive from hospitals.

Objective: To investigate inequities in hospital care among LGBT patients using the popular social media platform Twitter.

Method: This study examined a dataset of Twitter communications (tweets) collected from February 2015 to May 2017. The tweets mentioned Twitter handles for hospitals (i.e., usernames for hospitals) and LGBT related terms. The topics discussed were explored to develop an LGBT position index referring to whether the hospital appears supportive or not supportive of LGBT rights. Results for each hospital were then compared to the Healthcare Equality Index (HEI), an established index to evaluate equity of hospital care towards LGBT patients.

Results: In total, 1856 tweets mentioned LGBT terms representing 653 unique hospitals. Of these hospitals, 189 (28.9%) were identified as HEI leaders. Hospitals in the Northeast showed significantly greater support towards LGBT issues compared to hospitals in the Midwest. Hospitals deemed as HEI leaders had higher LGBT position scores compared to non-HEI leaders (p = 0.042), when controlling for hospital size and location.

Conclusions: This exploratory study describes a novel approach to monitoring LGBT hospital care. While these initial findings should be interpreted cautiously, they can potentially inform practices to improve equity of care and efforts to address health disparities among gender minority groups.

Keywords: Digital health; Healthcare disparities; Healthcare quality; Inequities; LGBT; Sexual and gender minorities; Social media; Twitter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources