Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Dec;47(6):567-573.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1078-2. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

Percutaneous nephrostomy vs ureteral stent for hydronephrosis secondary to ureteric calculi: impact on spontaneous stone passage and health-related quality of life-a prospective study

Nuno de Sousa Morais  1 , José P Pereira  2 , Paulo Mota  3   2 , Emanuel Carvalho-Dias  3   2 , João N Torres  3 , Estêvão Lima  3   2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Percutaneous nephrostomy vs ureteral stent for hydronephrosis secondary to ureteric calculi: impact on spontaneous stone passage and health-related quality of life-a prospective study

Nuno de Sousa Morais et al. Urolithiasis. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Ureteral calculi can be associated with urinary drainage blockage, requiring urinary diversion with percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) or retrograde ureteral stent (RUS). Currently no evidence exists to support the superiority of one method over the other. This study proposes to compare both approaches regarding the probability of spontaneous stone passage (SSP) and its effect on patient's quality of life (QoL). A prospective trial was carried out from July to October of 2017. 50 patients were selected with hydronephrosis secondary to ureteral stones requiring urgent urinary diversion and divided into two groups according to diversion technique: percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) or retrograde ureteral stent (RUS). The rate of SSP and QoL were evaluated. A PCN group (18 patients) and a RUS group (32 patients) were set. Stone size was higher in PCN (median 92 mm2) than RUS (median 47 mm2) (p = .012). The rate of SSP was 25% in RUS group and 38.9% in PCN. On the univariable analysis no statistical effect was found; however, when adjusted for stone size, location, previous ureteral manipulation and expulsive therapy, PCN showed a significant higher chance of SSP than RUS (OR = 6667). Besides, it was found that 30.2% (n = 13) of stones had an upward displacement associated with retrograde endoscopy. A significant decrease between pre- and post-intervention QoL was found with RUS (p < .001), but not found with PCN (p = .206). Patients in RUS group experienced more urinary symptoms, mostly haematuria (68.7% vs 16.7% in PCN group < .001) and dysuria (78.3% vs 16.7% in PCN group, p < .001). PCN was associated with a higher rate of spontaneous stone passage when adjusted for stone size and location. Moreover, PCN was better tolerated and associated with fewer urinary symptoms when compared with RUS.

Keywords: Percutaneous nephrostomy; Quality of life; Spontaneous passage; Ureteral stent; Urolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 Aug;7(8):491-4 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E122-8 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1998 Oct;160(4):1260-4 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4775-4785 - PubMed
    1. Rev Urol. 2010 Spring;12(2-3):e86-96 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources