Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;37(1):45-61.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0707-5.

Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Burden of Celiac Disease

Affiliations

Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Burden of Celiac Disease

Elizabeth S Mearns et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) has rapidly increased over recent decades, but costs related to CD remain poorly quantified.

Objective: This systematic review assessed the economic burden of CD in North America and Europe.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify English-language literature from 2007 to 2018 that assessed costs, cost effectiveness, and health resource utilization for CD.

Results: Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 28 (57.1%) addressed costs of testing and diagnosis; 33 (67.3%) were from Europe. The cost per positive CD diagnosis of testing patients already undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy for other indications ranged from 1300 Canadian dollars ($Can) in Canada (2016 value) to €44,712 in the Netherlands (2013 value). Adding the CD test was cost effective when it combined diagnostic modalities (e.g., serology and biopsy). Direct annual excess costs to a US payer per diagnosed CD patient totaled $US6000 (2013 value) more than for a person without CD, chiefly due to outpatient care. Hospitalizations, emergency visits, and medication use were more common with CD. After initiating a gluten-free diet (GFD), patients visited primary care providers less often, used more medications, and missed fewer days from school and work.

Conclusions: Most of the few available economic studies of CD assess testing and diagnosis costs, especially in Europe. Methods of testing generally are considered cost effective when they combine diagnostic modalities in symptomatic patients. Most costs to a payer of managing CD derive from outpatient care. Following GFD initiation, patients lose fewer days from work and school than pretreatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;14(6):947-57 - PubMed
    1. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2013 Nov;7(6):645-51 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;108(5):656-76; quiz 677 - PubMed
    1. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;31(1):108-120 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-46 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources