Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;19(6):99-108.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12452. Epub 2018 Sep 16.

Development of a dedicated phantom for multi-target single-isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing

Joel Poder  1 , Ryan Brown  1 , Harry Porter  1 , Rashmi Gupta  1 , Anna Ralston  1
Affiliations

Development of a dedicated phantom for multi-target single-isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing

Joel Poder et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this project was to design and manufacture a cost-effective end-to-end (E2E) phantom for quantifying the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of a linear accelerator based, multi-target single-isocenter (MTSI) frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique.

Method: A perspex Multi-Plug device from a Sun Nuclear ArcCheck phantom (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) was enhanced to make it more applicable for MTSI SRS E2E testing. The following steps in the SRS chain were then analysed using the phantom: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) distortion, planning computed tomography (CT) scan and MRI image registration accuracy, phantom setup accuracy using CBCT, dosimetric accuracy using ion chamber, planar film dose measurements and coincidence of linear accelerator mega-voltage (MV), and kilo-voltage (kV) isocenters using Winston-Lutz testing (WLT).

Results: The dedicated E2E phantom was able to successfully quantify the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of the MTSI SRS technique. MRI distortions were less than 0.5 mm, or half a voxel size. The average MRI-CT registration accuracy was 0.15 mm (±0.31 mm), 0.20 mm (±0.16 mm), and 0.39 mm (±0.11 mm) in the superior/inferior, left/right and, anterior/posterior directions, respectively. The phantom setup accuracy using CBCT was better than 0.2 mm and 0.1°. Point dose measurements were within 5% of the treatment planning system predicted dose. The comparison of planar film doses to the planning system dose distributions, performed using gamma analysis, resulted in pass rates greater than 97% for 3%/1 mm gamma criteria. Finally, off-axis WLT showed MV/kV coincidence to be within 1 mm for off-axis distances up to 60 mm.

Conclusion: A novel, versatile and cost-effective phantom for comprehensive E2E testing of MTSI SRS treatments was developed, incorporating multiple detector types and fiducial markers. The phantom is capable of quantifying the accuracy of each step in the MTSI SRS planning and treatment process.

Keywords: MRI deformation; dosimetric validation; end-to-end testing; multi-target; single isocentre; stereotactic radiosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Side‐on schematic of MTSI SRS E2E phantom, (b) Side‐on photograph of the MTSI SRS E2E phantom, (c) End‐on schematic of MTSI SRS E2E phantom, (d) End‐on photograph of the MTSI SRS E2E phantom.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Phantom insert for PTW PinPoint3D ionization chamber, (b) ball bearing insert, (c) Vitamin E insert, (d) GafChromic EBT3 film insert, (e) bone analogue insert.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MTSI SRS E2E phantom placed inside the QFix Encompass SRS headboard and mask system.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Axial CT slice indicating orientation of bone inserts in E2E phantom.
Figure 5
Figure 5
MRI/CT fusion of E2E phantom in (a) axial, and (b) coronal orientations.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average Winston‐Lutz test result (±1 SD), plotted as a function of distance away from isocenter for each of the three major axes (left/right, superior/inferior, anterior/posterior).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Measured film planar dose for Plan 9. Dose scale is shown in cGy.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Film gamma pass rate as a function of off‐axis distance, (b) Film gamma pass rate as a function of target size, (c) Film gamma pas rate as a function number of targets in the plan.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chin LS, Regine WF. Principles and Practice of Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
    1. Lohr F, Pirzkall A, Hof H, Fleckenstein K, Debus J. Adjuvant treatment of brain metastases. Paper presented at: Seminars in surgical oncology; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Prendergast BM, Popple RA, Clark GM, et al. Improved clinical efficiency in CNS stereotactic radiosurgery using a flattening filter free linear accelerator. J Radiosurg SBRT. 2011;1:117–122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark GM, Popple RA, Prendergast BM, et al. Plan quality and treatment planning technique for single isocenter cranial radiosurgery with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012;2:306–313. - PubMed
    1. Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole‐brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2483–2491. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources