Patient Perspectives on Intravenous Biologics for Rheumatologic Disease
- PMID: 30221490
- DOI: 10.1002/acr.23758
Patient Perspectives on Intravenous Biologics for Rheumatologic Disease
Abstract
Objective: Two surveys were conducted with patients with rheumatologic diseases to evaluate perceptions of different routes of administration (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC]) for biologic therapy.
Methods: In Survey I, patient preferences toward biologic treatment were evaluated at a rheumatology practice in Buffalo, New York. In Survey II, Canadian patients enrolled in the BioAdvance patient support program and scheduled to receive IV biologic therapy were asked about their opinions of IV treatment.
Results: In Survey I, 243 rheumatology patients participated. Median patient age was 60 years, 76% were female, and 44% were naive to treatment with biologic agents. Among biologic-naive patients, the majority (56%) were open to either SC or IV treatment; biologic-naive women were more likely than men to express a preference for the route of administration. In Survey II, 1,598 patients from the BioAdvance program (including 306 rheumatology patients) completed the full survey. Among the rheumatology patients, the median age was 49 years, 58% were female, and 61% had not previously taken biologics before enrolling in the BioAdvance program. The median rating of IV favorability (on a 10-point scale, with higher numbers indicating increased favorability) recalled by rheumatology patients was 5 prior to their first program infusion, which increased to 9 after multiple treatment infusions.
Conclusion: These survey results indicate that patients with rheumatoid arthritis are generally open to IV treatment and express high satisfaction with IV therapy. Additional patient and provider education may improve shared decision-making regarding biologic therapy administration options.
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.
Similar articles
-
BioAdvance Patient Support Program Survey: Positive Perception of Intravenous Infusions of Infliximab.Manag Care. 2017 Feb;26(2):41-48. Manag Care. 2017. PMID: 28273042
-
A Nationwide Survey on Patient's versus Physician´s Evaluation of Biological Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Disease Activity and Route of Administration: The Be-Raise Study.PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0166607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166607. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27893771 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Preference for Dosing Frequency Based on Prior Biologic Experience.J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Mar 1;16(3):220-226. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28301617
-
Upcoming biologic agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases.Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003 May;15(3):226-36. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200305000-00009. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003. PMID: 12707575 Review.
-
What is the future of targeted therapy in rheumatology: biologics or small molecules?BMC Med. 2014 Mar 13;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-43. BMC Med. 2014. PMID: 24620738 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Infusion Center Guidelines for Teprotumumab Infusions: Informed Consent, Safety, and Management of Side Effects.J Infus Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;44(6):331-338. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000446. J Infus Nurs. 2021. PMID: 34753152 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamics of Patient-Based Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 20;16:2609-2637. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S375062. eCollection 2022. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022. PMID: 36164323 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient Preferences for Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Treatment for Chronic Immune System Disorders: A Systematic Review.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Apr 19;15:811-834. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S303279. eCollection 2021. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021. PMID: 33907384 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared decision-making practices and patient values in pharmacist outpatient care for rheumatic disease: A multiple correspondence analysis.J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2023 Jan 20;26:11135. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2023.11135. eCollection 2023. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2023. PMID: 36942300 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative study exploring experiences of treatment in paediatric rheumatology - children's, young people's, parents' and carers' perspectives.Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2025 Jan 23;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12969-025-01063-w. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2025. PMID: 39849516 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, Aki AE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1-26.
-
- Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, Dougados M, Emery P, Gaujoux-Viala C, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:492-509.
-
- Gossec L, Smolen JS, Gaujoux-Viala C, Ash Z, Marzo-Ortega H, van der Heijde D, et al. European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:4-12.
-
- Ward MM, Deodhar A, Akl EA, Lui A, Ermann J, Gensler LS, et al. American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network 2015 recommendations for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;68:282-98.
-
- Blake T, Rao V, Hashmi T, Erb N, O'Reilly SC, Shaffy S, et al. The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;15:290.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources