Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2019 May;13(3):553-558.
doi: 10.1177/1932296818799365. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

Analysis of "Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations"

Affiliations
Comment

Analysis of "Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations"

Gary H Thorpe. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May.

Abstract

The article by Macleod and coauthors outlines an accuracy study of two blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMSs) against glucose-oxidase- and hexokinase-based assays showing how the reference/comparison method and inappropriate sample comparisons can affect accuracy conclusions. The dangers of independent institutions producing inappropriate conclusions when the methodology used for product regulatory or registration accuracy requirements is not according to best practice are stressed. The authors highlight several important aspects of a multistep accuracy evaluation protocol. However, it is essential that anyone undertaking or reporting BGMS accuracy studies should have a clear understanding of each and every protocol point, best practice, and how each can influence accuracy conclusions. Claims against regulatory accuracy criteria should be made only if the detailed specified protocol design and analysis is followed.

Keywords: BGMS accuracy; FDA guidance; ISO 15197; blood glucose monitoring system; protocol design; reference/comparison glucose method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Comment on

References

    1. Macleod K, Katz LB, Cameron H. Capillary and venous blood glucose accuracy in blood glucose meters versus reference standards: the impact of study design on accuracy evaluations. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1177/1932296818790228. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schnell O, Hinzmann R, Kulzer B, et al. Assessing the analytical performance of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose: concepts of performance evaluation and definition of metrological key terms. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(6):1585-1594. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simmons DA. How should blood glucose meter system analytical performance be assessed? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(1):178-184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pleus S, Flacke F, Sieber J, et al. Strengths and limitations of new approaches for graphical presentation of blood glucose monitoring system accuracy data. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(6):1226-1230. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Pleus S. Do the new FDA guidance documents help improving performance of blood glucose monitoring systems compared with ISO 15197? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(6):1240-1246. - PMC - PubMed