Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov;46(11):4775-4780.
doi: 10.1177/0300060518788247. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review

Affiliations
Review

Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review

Vida Gavrić Lovrec et al. J Int Med Res. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Although the incidence of retained surgical items (RSIs) is low, it is nevertheless an important preventable cause of patient injury that can ultimately lead to the patient's death and to subsequent high medical and legal costs. Unintentional RSI is the cause of 70% of re-interventions, with a morbidity of 80% and mortality of 35%. The most common RSIs are sponges or gauze (gossypiboma or textiloma), while retained surgical instruments and needles are rare. Perioperative counting of equipment and materials is the most common method of screening for RSIs, while a diagnosis can later be confirmed by the clinical appearance and by imaging studies. We present a rare case of a 43-year-old patient who was admitted to our hospital because of two retained needles following a cesarean section, despite several subsequent laparotomies. One needle had been removed previously, but in addition to the remaining needle, we also removed a retained gauze. The diagnosis of RSIs is extremely important, and safe surgical practices including the addition of new imaging technologies should be encouraged to detect RSIs.

Keywords: Retained surgical item; cesarean section; gauze; imaging; needle; surgery; surgical count.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Retained needle on pelvic X-ray examination.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pelvic ultrasound showing a hyperechogenic 15 mm long structure at the junction of the uterine corpus and cervix.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Pelvic ultrasound showing a structure of mixed echogenicity on the right side of the pelvis beside the uterus.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Retained needle on X-ray examination using low-energy X-rays in the right lateral part of the cervix just below the uterine corpus.

References

    1. Goldberg JL, Feldman DL. Implementing AORN recommended practices for prevention of retained surgical items. AORN J 2012; 95: 205–216; quiz 217–209. 2012/01/31. DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2011.11.010. - PubMed
    1. Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SR, et al. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 337–341. 2008/07/25. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318181c9a3. - PubMed
    1. Mahran MA, Toeima E, Morris EP. The recurring problem of retained swabs and instruments. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 27: 489–495. 2013/04/13. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.03.001. - PubMed
    1. Birolini DV, Rasslan S, Utiyama EM. Unintentionally retained foreign bodies after surgical procedures. Analysis of 4547 cases. Rev Col Bras Cir 2016; 43: 12–17. 2016/04/21. DOI: 10.1590/0100-69912016001004. - PubMed
    1. Porteous J. Surgical counts can be risky business! Can Oper Room Nurs J 2004; 22: 6–8, 10, 12. 2005/02/16. - PubMed