Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;41(11):2275-2280.
doi: 10.2337/dc18-1581. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

Glucose Management Indicator (GMI): A New Term for Estimating A1C From Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Affiliations

Glucose Management Indicator (GMI): A New Term for Estimating A1C From Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Richard M Bergenstal et al. Diabetes Care. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

While A1C is well established as an important risk marker for diabetes complications, with the increasing use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to help facilitate safe and effective diabetes management, it is important to understand how CGM metrics, such as mean glucose, and A1C correlate. Estimated A1C (eA1C) is a measure converting the mean glucose from CGM or self-monitored blood glucose readings, using a formula derived from glucose readings from a population of individuals, into an estimate of a simultaneously measured laboratory A1C. Many patients and clinicians find the eA1C to be a helpful educational tool, but others are often confused or even frustrated if the eA1C and laboratory-measured A1C do not agree. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration determined that the nomenclature of eA1C needed to change. This led the authors to work toward a multipart solution to facilitate the retention of such a metric, which includes renaming the eA1C the glucose management indicator (GMI) and generating a new formula for converting CGM-derived mean glucose to GMI based on recent clinical trials using the most accurate CGM systems available. The final aspect of ensuring a smooth transition from the old eA1C to the new GMI is providing new CGM analyses and explanations to further understand how to interpret GMI and use it most effectively in clinical practice. This Perspective will address why a new name for eA1C was needed, why GMI was selected as the new name, how GMI is calculated, and how to understand and explain GMI if one chooses to use GMI as a tool in diabetes education or management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plot of CGM-measured mean glucose concentration vs. central laboratory–measured A1C used to compute the formula to estimate GMI, combining data from four randomized trials using the Dexcom G4 sensor with 505 software (N = 528) described in the Supplementary Data. The shaded area represents the 95% CI of the regression line. The regression equation to compute GMI (%) = 3.31 + 0.02392 × [mean glucose in mg/dL] or GMI (mmol/mol) = 12.71 + 4.70587 × [mean glucose in mmol/L]. A calculator to compute GMI is available at www.jaeb.org/gmi and www.AGPreport.org/agp/links.

Comment in

References

    1. Riddlesworth TD, Beck RW, Gal RL, et al. . Optimal sampling duration for continuous glucose monitoring to determine long-term glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018;20:314–316 - PubMed
    1. Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, et al. . International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1631–1640 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck RW, Connor CG, Mullen DM, Wesley DM, Bergenstal RM. The fallacy of average: how using HbA1c alone to assess glycemic control can be misleading. Diabetes Care 2017;40:994–999 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. .; T1D Exchange Clinic Network . Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 2015;38:971–978 - PubMed
    1. Dickinson JK, Guzman SJ, Maryniuk MD, et al. . The use of language in diabetes care and education. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1790–1799 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms