Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Sep 17;8(9):e021779.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021779.

Incidence of unintended pregnancy among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Incidence of unintended pregnancy among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Frances H Ampt et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the incidence of unintended pregnancy among female sex workers (FSWs) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Design: We searched MEDLINE, PsychInfo, Embase and Popline for papers published in English between January 2000 and January 2016, and Web of Science and Proquest for conference abstracts. Meta-analysis was performed on the primary outcomes using random effects models, with subgroup analysis used to explore heterogeneity.

Participants: Eligible studies targeted FSWs aged 15-49 years living or working in an LMIC.

Outcome measures: Studies were eligible if they provided data on one of two primary outcomes: incidence of unintended pregnancy and incidence of pregnancy where intention is undefined. Secondary outcomes were also extracted when they were reported in included studies: incidence of induced abortion; incidence of birth; and correlates/predictors of pregnancy or unintended pregnancy.

Results: Twenty-five eligible studies were identified from 3866 articles. Methodological quality was low overall. Unintended pregnancy incidence showed high heterogeneity (I²>95%), ranging from 7.2 to 59.6 per 100 person-years across 10 studies. Study design and duration were found to account for heterogeneity. On subgroup analysis, the three cohort studies in which no intervention was introduced had a pooled incidence of 27.1 per 100 person-years (95% CI 24.4 to 29.8; I2=0%). Incidence of pregnancy (intention undefined) was also highly heterogeneous, ranging from 2.0 to 23.4 per 100 person-years (15 studies).

Conclusions: Of the many studies examining FSWs' sexual and reproductive health in LMICs, very few measured pregnancy and fewer assessed pregnancy intention. Incidence varied widely, likely due to differences in study design, duration and baseline population risk, but was high in most studies, representing a considerable concern for this key population. Evidence-based approaches that place greater importance on unintended pregnancy prevention need to be incorporated into existing sexual and reproductive health programmes for FSWs.

Prospero registration number: CRD42016029185.

Keywords: epidemiology; preventive medicine; public health; reproductive medicine; sexual medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of search results and inclusion of studies after review. FSWs, female sex workers; LMICs, low-income and middle-income countries; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence rates (per 100 person-years) for studies reporting unintended pregnancy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot showing subgroup analysis of unintended pregnancy incidence rates (per 100 person-years) by intervention versus no intervention.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot showing subgroup analysis of unintended pregnancy incidence rates (per 100 person-years) by RCT versus cohort study design. RCT, randomised controlled study.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot showing subgroup analysis of unintended pregnancy incidence rates (per 100 person-years) by study duration (cut-off 1 year).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot showing subgroup analysis of pregnancy (intention undefined) incidence rates (per 100 person-years) by geographic region.

References

    1. Singh S, Darroch JE, Ashford LS. Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2014.
    1. Hall JA, Benton L, Copas A, et al. . Pregnancy intention and pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J 2017;21:670–704. 10.1007/s10995-016-2237-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2008;39:18–38. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00148.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan MR, Turner AN, Pettifor A, et al. . Unmet need for contraception among sex workers in Madagascar. Contraception 2009;79:221–7. 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.09.011 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luchters S, Bosire W, Feng A, et al. . "A Baby was an added burden": predictors and consequences of unintended pregnancies for female sex workers in mombasa, kenya: a mixed-methods study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0162871 10.1371/journal.pone.0162871 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources