Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 26:2018:8382148.
doi: 10.1155/2018/8382148. eCollection 2018.

MT1-MMP as a PET Imaging Biomarker for Pancreas Cancer Management

Affiliations

MT1-MMP as a PET Imaging Biomarker for Pancreas Cancer Management

Miguel Ángel Morcillo et al. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. .

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to be one of the deadliest cancers for which optimal diagnostic tools are still greatly needed. Identification of PDAC-specific molecular markers would be extremely useful to improve disease diagnosis and follow-up. MT1-MMP has long been involved in pancreatic cancer, especially in tumour invasion and metastasis. In this study, we aim to ascertain the suitability of MT1-MMP as a biomarker for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Two probes were assessed and compared for this purpose, an MT1-MMP-specific binding peptide (MT1-AF7p) and a specific antibody (LEM2/15), labelled, respectively, with 68Ga and with 89Zr. PET imaging with both probes was conducted in patient-derived xenograft (PDX), subcutaneous and orthotopic, PDAC mouse models, and in a cancer cell line (CAPAN-2)-derived xenograft (CDX) model. Both radiolabelled tracers were successful in identifying, by means of PET imaging techniques, tumour tissues expressing MT1-MMP although they did so at different uptake levels. The 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 probe showed greater specific activity compared to the 68Ga-labelled peptide. The mean value of tumour uptake for the 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 probe (5.67 ± 1.11%ID/g, n=28) was 25-30 times higher than that of the 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p ones. Tumour/blood ratios (1.13 ± 0.51 and 1.44 ± 0.43 at 5 and 7 days of 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 after injection) were higher than those estimated for 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p probes (of approximately tumour/blood ratio = 0.5 at 90 min after injection). Our findings strongly point out that (i) the in vivo detection of MT1-MMP by PET imaging is a promising strategy for PDAC diagnosis and (ii) labelled LEM2/15 antibody is a better candidate than MT1-AF7p for PDAC detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Purification of 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 in a PD-10 column; the antibody elutes between volume fractions 2.5 and 5.0 ml. Inset: ITLC image illustrating RQP of the 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 peak. 1 corresponds to the radioimmunoconjugate and 2 to the free radionuclide. (b) Percentage of bound radioactivity to LEM2/15 after 7-day incubation of 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 with human serum at 37°C (formula image) and 4°C (formula image) and human plasma at 37°C (formula image) and 4°C (formula image); data expressed as mean ± SD. (n=4). Representative HPLC chromatogram of 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1 before (c) or after (d) to Sep-Pak Light C18 cartridge purification. 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1 is detected at 8.7 min by UV absorbance at 280 nm (formula image) and radioactivity detector (formula image).
Figure 2
Figure 2
CAPAN-2-tumour-bearing mice injected with 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p probes. (a) PET/CT image of representative mouse with subcutaneous CAPAN-2 xenograft (white arrows) that was injected with 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1. Image was acquired 90 min after injection. (b) Immunohistochemistry of tumour tissue from xenografted mice. MT1-MMP was detected using LEM2/15 antibody. Scale bar: 1000 µm. Higher magnification of the boxed area is shown at the right corner. Scale bar: 50 µm. (c) Tumour uptake (expressed as %ID/g) of 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1 and 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-2 probes as quantified by PET imaging. (d) Tumour-to-blood ratio derived from PET images for both radiolabelled probes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Heterotopic patient-derived xenografted mice injected with 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1. (a) PET/CT image of representative heterotopic PDX mouse injected with 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1 acquired 90 min after injection. Tumour locations are indicated by white arrows. (b) Immunohistochemistry of tumour tissue from PDX mice. MT1-MMP was detected using LEM2/15 antibody. Scale bar: 1000 µm. Higher magnification of the boxed area is shown at the right corner. Scale bar: 50 µm. (c) Tumour volume was measured by CT four times after onset of PET imaging study. Each tumour is represented by a different colour line on the graph. (d) Tumour uptake (quantified by PET imaging and expressed as %ID/g) as a function of tumour volume for all scanned mice, showing that there is no relationship between tumour size and 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1 uptake. (e) Variation of tumour uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1 along the PET imaging study. (f) Variation of kidneys and liver uptakes of 68Ga-DOTA-AF7p-1 along the PET imaging study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CAPAN-2-tumour-bearing mice injected with 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15. (a) Representative PET/CT images of a mouse with subcutaneous CAPAN-2 xenograft injected with 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 acquired at 1 and 7 days after injection. Tumour locations are indicated by white arrows. (b) Immunohistochemistry of tumour tissue from xenografted mice. MT1-MMP was detected using LEM2/15 antibody. Scale bar: 100 µm. (c) Tumour uptake (expressed as %ID/g) of 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 as quantified by PET imaging. (d) Tumour-to-blood and tumour-to-background ratios derived from PET images. (e) Liver and bone uptake of 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 as quantified by PET imaging at different times after injection.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Orthotopic patient-derived xenografted mice injected with 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15. (a) Representative PET/CT images of orthotopic PDX and control mice injected with 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 acquired at 1 and 7 days after injection. Tumour locations are indicated by white arrows. (b) Immunohistochemistry studies of pancreas tissues derived from orthotopic PDX and control mice. MT1-MMP was detected using LEM2/15 antibody. Scale bar: 50 µm. (c) Tumour uptake (expressed as %ID/g) of 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 as quantified by PET imaging. (d) Tumour-to-blood and tumour-to-background ratios derived from PET images. (e) Liver and bone uptake of 89Zr-DFO-LEM2/15 as quantified by PET imaging at different times after injection in PDX and control mice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ryan D. P., Hong T. S., Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(11):1039–1049. doi: 10.1056/nejmra1404198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chu L. C., Goggins M. G., Fishman E. K. Diagnosis and detection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Journal. 2017;23:333–342. doi: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000290. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sahani D. V., Bonaffini P. A., Catalano O. A., et al. State-of-the-art PET/CT of the pancreas: current role and emerging indications. RadioGraphics. 2012;32(4):1133–1158. doi: 10.1148/rg.324115143. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mimori K., Fukagawa T., Kosaka Y., et al. A large-study of MT1-MMP as a marker for isolated tumor cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow in gastric cancer cases. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2008;15(10):2934–2942. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9916-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perentes J. Y., Kirkpatrick N. D., Nagano S., et al. Cancer cell-associated MT1-MMP promotes blood vessel invasion and distant metastasis in triple-negative mammary tumors. Cancer Research. 2011;71(13):4527–4538. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-4376. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources