Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 1;33(38):e236.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e236. eCollection 2018 Sep 17.

Clinical Usefulness of Unenhanced Computed Tomography in Patients with Acute Pyelonephritis

Anna Lee  1 , Hyo-Cheol Kim  2 , Sung Il Hwang  3 , Ho Jun Chin  1 , Ki Young Na  1 , Dong-Wan Chae  1 , Sejoong Kim  1
Affiliations

Clinical Usefulness of Unenhanced Computed Tomography in Patients with Acute Pyelonephritis

Anna Lee et al. J Korean Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Unenhanced computed tomography (UCT) may be useful for evaluating acute pyelonephritis; however, no study has compared UCT with enhanced computed tomography (ECT) as a diagnostic tool. We evaluated a clinical usefulness of UCT versus ECT in acute pyelonephritis (APN).

Methods: We reviewed the clinical and radiological data from 183 APN-suspected patients who underwent UCT and ECT simultaneously at emergency room (ER) over a two-year period. Demographic, clinical parameters and computed tomography (CT) parameters of 149 patients were compared.

Results: The average patient age was 61.2 (± 10) years: 31 patients were men. Ninety-nine (66.4%) patients showed stones (18.7%), perinephric infiltration (56%), swelling (21%), and hydronephrosis (6.7%) on UCT. Seventeen patients (11.4%) had an atypical clinical course, requiring additional tests for accurate diagnosis. In 7 patients UCT and ECT results did not differ; in 10 patients, the diagnosis changed on ECT. On ECT, 112/149 (75.2%) patients had stones (16.7%), perinephric infiltrations (57%), swelling (21%), and hydronephrosis (6.7%); 62.5% showed parenchymal involvement: 34 (22.8%) patients had no abnormal ECT findings. APN CT findings are similar on stone, perinephric infiltration, swelling and hydronephrosis on both CTs. Twelve patients (8.0%) had an abnormal ECT finding, i.e., low-grade (1 and 2) parenchymal involvement. Six (4%) patients developed contrast-induced acute kidney injury within 2 days after ECT.

Conclusion: We demonstrate that UCT is not inferior to ECT as an initial tool for evaluating APN for screening nephrolithiasis and hydronephrosis without the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI). However, patients with an atypical clinical course may still need ECT.

Keywords: Acute Pyelonephritis; Contrast-induced Nephropathy; Parenchymal Involvement; Perinephric Infiltration; Unenhanced Computed Tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Study algorithm.
APN = acute pyelonephritis, CT = computed tomography, MM = multiple myeloma, EM = endometrial, MALT = mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma, UCT = unenhanced computed tomography, ECT = enhanced computed tomography, CIAKI = contrast induced acute kidney injury, VUR = vesicoureteral reflux.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Grade of parenchymal involvement. (A) grade 0: no renal parenchyma involvement, (B) grade 1: less than 25% involvement, (C) grade 2: 25%–50% involvement, (D) grade 3: 50%–75% involvement, (E) grade 4: greater than 75% involvement, and (F) Abcess. Left side present are UCT and right side present are ECT.
UCT = unenhanced computed tomography, ECT = enhanced computed tomography.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jung YH, Cho IR, Lee SE, Lee KC, Kim JG, Jeon JS, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical parameters in acute pyelonephritis. Korean J Urol. 2007;48(1):29–34.
    1. Ki M, Park T, Choi B, Foxman B. The epidemiology of acute pyelonephritis in South Korea, 1997–1999. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(10):985–993. - PubMed
    1. Johri N, Cooper B, Robertson W, Choong S, Rickards D, Unwin R. An update and practical guide to renal stone management. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;116(3):c159–71. - PubMed
    1. Goldman SM. Acute and chronic urinary infection: present concepts and controversies. Urol Radiol. 1988;10(1):17–24. - PubMed
    1. Goldman SM, Fishman EK. Upper urinary tract infection: the current role of CT, ultrasound, and MRI. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1991;12(4):335–360. - PubMed