Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 4:6:63-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.08.008. eCollection 2018 Dec.

Building the case for housing policy: Understanding public beliefs about housing affordability as a key social determinant of health

Affiliations

Building the case for housing policy: Understanding public beliefs about housing affordability as a key social determinant of health

Selena E Ortiz et al. SSM Popul Health. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The current housing crisis in the U.S. requires the consideration and promotion of policies that improve the circumstances of severe housing cost burdens. Building public awareness of the health impacts associated with housing affordability may be a key prerequisite for policy change.

Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data from a national survey were used to investigate public understandings about housing affordability as a key driver of health. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated to test whether any relationships existed between respondents' considerations and concerns about housing affordability and their perceptions about housing affordability as a social determinant of health.

Findings: These data support four key findings. First, understandings of the relationship between affordable housing and health are partisan and income-based driven, with Republicans and high-income respondents less likely to acknowledge the effects of housing affordability on health. Second, varied frames of communication about the relationship between housing affordability and health may produce significantly different reactions among political and income subgroups.Third, while there is considerable agreement that housing affordability promotes health when using forced-choice measures, connections between affordable housing and health are not readily volunteered. Finally, the themes of personal responsibility and stability and security significantly resonate with Republicans and high-income earners.

Conclusions: Contextualizing the issue of housing affordability within various domains in ways that effectively resonate with the American public and policymakers and across political and income spectra, is highly imperative.

Keywords: Affordable housing; Health; Mixed methods; Policy; Public opinion; Values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Number of references made per qualitative theme.

References

    1. Aidala A.A., Wilson M.G., Shubert V., Goglishvili D., Globerman J., Rueda S., Bozack A.K., Caban M., Rourke S.B. Housing status, medical care, and health outcomes among people living with HIV/AIDS: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2016;106(1):e1–e23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American National Election Studies . The University of Michigan and Stanford University; Ann Arbor, MI and Palo Alto, CA: 2014. User’s guide and codebook for the ANES 2012 time series study.
    1. Belden N., Shashaty A., Zipperer J. Belden Russonello & Stewart; Washington, DC: 2004. What we know about public attitudes on affordable housign: A review of existing public opinion research; pp. 1–72.
    1. Bennett S.E. Comparing Americans’ political information in 1988 and 1992. The Journal of Politics. 1995;57(2):521–532.
    1. Bentley R., Baker E., Mason K., Subramanian S., Kavanagh A.M. Association between housing affordability and mental health: a longitudinal analysis of a nationally representative household survey in Australia. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2011;174(7):753–760. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources