Clostridium difficile colonization among patients with clinically significant diarrhea and no identifiable cause of diarrhea
- PMID: 30226126
- PMCID: PMC6890223
- DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.225
Clostridium difficile colonization among patients with clinically significant diarrhea and no identifiable cause of diarrhea
Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence of Clostridium difficile colonization among patients who meet the 2017 IDSA/SHEA C. difficile infection (CDI) Clinical Guideline Update criteria for the preferred patient population for C. difficile testing.
Design: Retrospective cohort.
Setting: Tertiary-care hospital in St. Louis, Missouri.PatientsPatients whose diarrheal stool samples were submitted to the hospital's clinical microbiology laboratory for C. difficile testing (toxin EIA) from August 2014 to September 2016.InterventionsElectronic and manual chart review were used to determine whether patients tested for C. difficile toxin had clinically significant diarrhea and/or any alternate cause for diarrhea. Toxigenic C. difficile culture was performed on all stool specimens from patients with clinically significant diarrhea and no known alternate cause for their diarrhea.
Results: A total of 8,931 patients with stool specimens submitted were evaluated: 570 stool specimens were EIA positive (+) and 8,361 stool specimens were EIA negative (-). Among the EIA+stool specimens, 107 (19% of total) were deemed eligible for culture. Among the EIA- stool specimens, 515 (6%) were eligible for culture. One EIA+stool specimen (1%) was toxigenic culture negative. Among the EIA- stool specimens that underwent culture, toxigenic C. difficile was isolated from 63 (12%).
Conclusions: Most patients tested for C. difficile do not have clinically significant diarrhea and/or potential alternate causes for diarrhea. The prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile colonization among EIA- patients who met the IDSA/SHEA CDI guideline criteria for preferred patient population for C. difficile testing was 12%.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest.
Outside the submitted work, E.R.D. reports grants from Rebiotix; grants and personal fees from Pfizer and Merck; and personal fees from Valneva, Rebiotix, Achaogen, Biofire, Abbott, and Synthetic Biologics. Outside the submitted work, C.D.B. reports grants from bioMerieux, Cepheid, and Luminex; grants and personal fees from Accelerate Diagnostics; and personal fees from BioRad and the
Figures
References
-
- Dubberke ER, Burnham CD. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: treat the patient, not the test. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1801–1802. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
