Cycle Time Metrics for Multisite Clinical Trials in the United States
- PMID: 30227522
- DOI: 10.1177/2168479012464371
Cycle Time Metrics for Multisite Clinical Trials in the United States
Abstract
Conducting randomized controlled trials entails a prolonged, costly study start-up (SSU) process that may create significant delays. Optimizing the operational aspects of multisite trials requires identifying benchmarks in the SSU process and the potential delays associated with them. We engaged in a collaborative effort to identify and describe key SSU intervals that correspond with necessary procedures and processes for activating multisite clinical trials in the US. After developing definitions for SSU benchmarks and obtaining data from research coordinating entities, we identified factors that were significantly associated with reduced cycle times, including the use of central institutional review boards for study approval and status as a private practice or independent research site. However, small sample sizes and large proportions of missing data hamper the interpretability of our results. Future development of standard measures of SSU efficiency will be critical to analyzing and improving study initiation processes at US research sites.
Keywords: metrics; study start-up; trials.
Similar articles
-
Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials.Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597685. Epub 2015 Sep 15. Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 26374678 Free PMC article.
-
A multisite study of performance drivers among institutional review boards.J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Jun;1(3):192-197. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.8. Epub 2017 Jul 24. J Clin Transl Sci. 2017. PMID: 29093967 Free PMC article.
-
Erlotinib: CP 358774, NSC 718781, OSI 774, R 1415.Drugs R D. 2003;4(4):243-8. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200304040-00006. Drugs R D. 2003. PMID: 12848590
-
Overcoming Challenges in Multisite Trials.Nurs Res. 2019 May/Jun;68(3):227-236. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000324. Nurs Res. 2019. PMID: 31033866 Review.
-
Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):291-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00354.x. Health Serv Res. 2005. PMID: 15663714 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Drivers of Start-Up Delays in Global Randomized Clinical Trials.Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jan;55(1):212-227. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00207-2. Epub 2020 Sep 21. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021. PMID: 32959207 Free PMC article.
-
Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials.Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597685. Epub 2015 Sep 15. Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 26374678 Free PMC article.
-
RESEARCH ETHICS. Evidence gaps and ethical review of multicenter studies.Science. 2015 Nov 6;350(6261):632-3. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4872. Science. 2015. PMID: 26542556 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Lessons Learned from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Covid-19 Clinical Trials.NEJM Evid. 2024 Nov;3(11):EVIDctcs2300291. doi: 10.1056/EVIDctcs2300291. Epub 2024 Oct 22. NEJM Evid. 2024. PMID: 39437132 Free PMC article.
-
Leveraging retooled clinical research infrastructure for Clinical Research Management System implementation at a large Academic Medical Center.J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 18;7(1):e127. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.550. eCollection 2023. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023. PMID: 37313387 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources