Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 18;8(1):13959.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32293-6.

Cleaner shrimp are a sustainable option to treat parasitic disease in farmed fish

Affiliations

Cleaner shrimp are a sustainable option to treat parasitic disease in farmed fish

David B Vaughan et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Chemical use is widespread in aquaculture to treat parasitic diseases in farmed fish. Cleaner fish biocontrols are increasingly used in fish farming as an alternative to medicines. However, cleaner fish are susceptible to some of their clients' parasites and their supply is largely dependent on wild harvest. In comparison, cleaner shrimp are not susceptible to fish ectoparasites and they can be reliably bred in captivity. The effectiveness of shrimp in reducing parasites on farmed fish remained unexplored until now. We tested four cleaner shrimp species for their ability to reduce three harmful parasites (a monogenean fluke, a ciliate protozoan, and a leech) on a farmed grouper. All shrimp reduced parasites on fish and most reduced the free-living early-life environmental stages - a function not provided by cleaner fish. Cleaner shrimp are sustainable biocontrol candidates against parasites of farmed fish, with the peppermint cleaner shrimp reducing parasites by up to 98%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of cleaner shrimp on Cryptocaryon irritans. (a) Reduction of C. irritans trophonts (parasitic stage) on fish by cleaner shrimp diurnally. (b) Nocturnally. (c) Reduction of C. irritans tomonts (environmental stage) diurnally. (d) Nocturnally. Data expressed as the proportion recovered.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of cleaner shrimp on Neobenedenia girellae. (a) Reduction of sub-adult N. girellae (parasitic stage) on fish by cleaner shrimp diurnally. (b) Nocturnally. (c) Reduction of N. girellae eggs (environmental stage) diurnally. (d) Nocturnally. Data expressed as the proportion recovered.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of cleaner shrimp on Zeylanicobdella arugamensis. (a) Reduction of sub-adult Z. arugamensis (parasitic stage) by cleaner shrimp diurnally or nocturnally. (b) Reduction of Z. arugamensis cocoons (environmental stage) by Lysmata vittata over 24 hours. Data expressed as the proportion recovered.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Shrimp species performance matrix. Ranking: Undetermined, no current data; Insignificant, p > 0.05; Poor, 11–24% reduction; Moderate, 25–49% reduction; Good, 50–74% reduction; Excellent, 75–100% reduction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Experimental design demonstrating treatment and control setup for a single replicate for parasitic (on fish) and environmental stages, and shrimp species used. (a) Neobenedenia girellae. (b) Cryptocaryon irritans trophont. (c) Zeylanicobdella arugamensis. (d) Cryptocaryon irritans tomonts (cysts) or Z. arugamensis cocoons on microscope slide. (e) Embryonated Neobenedenia girellae eggs attached to bridal tulle. LS. Recirculating seawater life-support system with filtered influent (blue arrows), and effluent (grey arrows) schematic water flow; 1. Fitted tank lid; 2. 60 µm mesh tank cover; 3. Individual experimental tank positioned inside a water catchment tray.

References

    1. Grunert KG. Sustainability in the food sector: a consumer behaviour perspective. Int. J. Food. Syst. Dynam. 2011;2:207–218.
    1. Banarjee S, Kumar S, Pathak AN. Drug effect on aquaculture and it’s remediation. J. Drug. Delivery. Therap. 2014;4:117–122.
    1. Claret A, et al. Consumer beliefs regarding farmed versus wild fish. Appetite. 2014;79:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Done, H. Y., Venkatesan, A. K. & Halden, R. U. Does the recent growth of aquaculture create antibiotic resistance threats different from those associated with land animal production in agriculture? AAPS. J. 17, 10.1208/s12248-015-9722-z. (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watts, J. E. M., Schreier, H. J., Lanska, L. & Hale, M. S. The rising tide of antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: sources, sinks and solutions. Mar. Drugs. 15, 10.3390/md15060158. (2017). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources