Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May-Jun;114(3):163-167.

Meeting the Contraceptive Needs of a Community: Increasing Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

Colleen McNicholas  1 , Tessa Madden  2
Affiliations

Meeting the Contraceptive Needs of a Community: Increasing Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

Colleen McNicholas et al. Mo Med. 2017 May-Jun.

Abstract

To control their reproductive lives, women must have access to all contraceptive methods including the most effective reversible methods, intrauterine devices, and implants. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project, a study of 9,256 women in St. Louis, showed that when barriers to contraception are removed, many women choose intrauterine devices and implants, substantially reducing rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. This article discusses strategies we learned from the CHOICE Project to improve uptake of the most effective contraceptive methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of Contraceptive Method Choice at Baseline in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. DMPA, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection; IUD, intrauterine device; implant, levonorgestrel implant; pills, oral contraceptive pills; ring, vaginal ring
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of Contraceptive Method Choice at Baseline for Teen in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.
None
None
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(9):843–852. http://nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones RK, Kavanaugh M. Changes in Abortion Rates Between 2000 and 2008 and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(6):1358–1366. - PubMed
    1. Kost K, Maddow-Zimet I. U.S. Teenage Pregnancies, Births and Abortions, 2011: State Trends by Age, Race and Ethnicity. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2016. http://www.guttmacher.org/report/us-teen-pregnancy-state-trends-2011.
    1. Institute TG. Fulfilling the Promise: Public Policy and U.S. Family Planning Clinics. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2000.
    1. Mayer JP. Unintended childbearing, maternal beliefs, and delay of prenatal care. Birth. 1997;24(4):247–252. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources