Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;6(7):1089-1098.
doi: 10.1177/2050640618776740. Epub 2018 May 4.

Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps can reduce post-procedure abdominal pain: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps can reduce post-procedure abdominal pain: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Su Young Kim et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Studies of the use of CO2 insufflation during endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps (LCPs) are lacking.

Objective: We evaluated the effect of CO2 insufflation on pain after endoscopic resection of LCPs.

Methods: In a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT), 132 patients were randomly assigned to groups who underwent endoscopic resection with CO2 insufflation (CO2 group, n = 66) or air insufflation (air group, n = 66). The primary outcome was abdominal pain post-procedure (PP). The secondary outcomes were abdominal distension, rates of technical success, amounts of sedatives prescribed, use of analgesics, and adverse events.

Results: Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean abdominal pain score was 12.3 in the CO2 group vs. 17.5 in the air group at 1 h PP (p = 0.047). Also, the proportion of patients without pain was significantly higher in the CO2 group at 1 h PP (p = 0.008). The pain score differed more in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group and long-time group. The secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions: The results of this RCT demonstrate the superiority of CO2 insufflation for endoscopic resection of LCPs in terms of decreasing PP abdominal pain (KCT0001636).

Keywords: Carbon dioxide; colonoscopy; colorectal polyp; endoscopic mucosal resection; endoscopic submucosal dissection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patients’ flow-chart. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CO2: carbon dioxide.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Visual analog scale scores for abdominal pain of the CO2 and air groups after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps. Patients in the CO2 group had significantly lower pain scores 1 hour after the procedure.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportion of patients free of pain. The proportion of patients free of pain was higher in the CO2 group than in the air group at all time points. The difference was significant 1 hour after the procedure.

References

    1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687–696. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36: 2251–2270. - PubMed
    1. Kedia P, Waye JD. Routine and advanced polypectomy techniques. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011; 13: 506–511. - PubMed
    1. Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS, et al. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: A systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 843–849. - PubMed
    1. Wang WL, Wu ZH, Sun Q, et al. Meta-analysis: The use of carbon dioxide insufflation vs. room air insufflation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35: 1145–1154. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources