Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;30(8):1323-1328.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3756-6. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain

Affiliations

Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain

Elizabeth J Goodall et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Midurethral slings (MUS) are an established treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), with good objective outcomes and low rates of complications. However, large population-based registry studies highlighted long-term complications from polypropylene slings including erosion, dyspareunia and chronic pain. With recent highly negative media coverage, many women are presenting with chronic pain attributed to the mesh to request complete removal. The available literature provides limited evidence on safety, symptom resolution and incontinence following MUS removal.

Methods: We identified all patients who underwent laparoscopic removal of MUS mesh at our hospital between 2011 and 2016. We extracted data from medical records to assess operative safety and contacted all patients by questionnaire that incorporated pain scales, symptom severity and satisfaction.

Results: A total of 56 women were assessed. Removal occurred at a median of 44 months following sling insertion (range 3-192). Mean operative time was 74 min (range 44-132). Two patients were returned to theatre (one at 24 hours and one at 14 days) to evacuate a retropubic haematoma, but no visceral injuries occurred. The median inpatient stay was 2 days (range 1-7). Of the 46% of patients who returned the questionnaire (n = 26), 88% said they would recommend the procedure. There was a median 6-point decrease in pain scores (10-point numerical scale, p < 0.0001); 44.6% reported worsening SUI, more common with removal of the suburethral mesh [odds ratio (OR) 10.72 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-104].

Conclusions: Laparoscopic removal of MUS is feasible and effective but carries a risk of worsening SUI.

Keywords: Chronic pain; Laparoscopic removal; Mesh; Patient satisfaction; Retropubic midurethral slings; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jul;27(7):1021-7 - PubMed
    1. Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):12015 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Apr;21(4):423-30 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):495.e1-495.e7 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9(4):210-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources